Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (z-ai/glm-5.2)audited 2026-07-29
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

If (Y,d) is complete then YX is complete in the uniform metric, and so is C(X,Y)

Statement

Let X be a nonempty set, let (Y,d) be a complete metric space (Complete metric space: every Cauchy sequence converges in the space) and let ρˉ be the uniform metric on YX (For a nonempty set X and a metric space (Y,d) the uniform metric ρˉ(f,g)=sup⁡xmin⁡{d(f(x),g(x)),1} is a metric on YX). Then:

  1. (YX,ρˉ) is a complete metric space.
  2. If in addition X carries a topology, then C(X,Y) with the restriction of ρˉ (Uniform convergence, and the topology of uniform convergence: the metric topology of the uniform metric on YX and on C(X,Y)) is a complete metric space.

No choice principle is used. The limit function is defined by a formula, not chosen: a Cauchy sequence in a complete metric space has exactly one limit (A sequence in a metric space has at most one limit), so x↦lim⁡kfk(x) is a function, and nothing is selected.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A nonempty set X, a complete metric space (Y,d), the truncated metric dˉ=min⁡{d,1} on Y, the uniform metric ρˉ on YX, and a ρˉ-Cauchy sequence (fk) in YX.

[L2]

(xk) is Cauchy in a metric space when for every real ε>0 there is K with the distance between xm and xn below ε for all m,n≥K; the rational and real tests agree (Cauchy sequence in a metric space, The rationals embed densely in the reals).

[L4]

xk→p in a metric space means: for every real ε>0 there is K with the distance from xk to p below ε for every k≥K (Convergence of a sequence in a metric space: xk→x iff d(xk,x)→0 in R, Open ball, closed ball and sphere in a metric space, The rationals embed densely in the reals).

[L6]

C(X,Y) is a closed subset of (YX,ρˉ) when X is a nonempty topological space (A uniform limit of continuous functions is continuous, so C(X,Y) is closed in YX under the uniform metric, claim 3).

[L8]

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

Let x∈X and let ε>0 be real; put η:=min⁡{ε,1}/2, a real with 0<η≤1/2<1 and η<ε, and take K with ρˉ(fm,fn)<η for all m,n≥K.

givenL1L2choose
1.2

Let ε>0 be real; put η:=min⁡{ε,1}/4, a real with 0<η≤1/4<1 and 4η≤ε, and take K with ρˉ(fm,fn)<η for all m,n≥K.

givenL1L2choose
2.1

For m,n≥K: dˉ(fm(x),fn(x))≤ρˉ(fm,fn)<η<1, hence d(fm(x),fn(x))=dˉ(fm(x),fn(x))<η<ε.

step 1.1L1
3.1

As ε was an arbitrary positive real, step 2.1 makes (fk(x)) a d-Cauchy sequence in Y for every x∈X; by completeness it converges, and its limit is unique, so f(x):=lim⁡kfk(x) defines a function f∈YX with no selection made.

step 2.1L2L3L8
4.1

Fix n≥K and x∈X; since fm(x)→f(x) in (Y,d) and dˉ≤d, there is m≥K with dˉ(fm(x),f(x))<η, and then dˉ(fn(x),f(x))≤dˉ(fn(x),fm(x))+dˉ(fm(x),f(x))<η+η=2η.

step 3.1step 1.2L1L4L5
5.1

Step 4.1 holds for every x∈X, so 2η bounds the values dˉ(fn(x),f(x)) above and hence ρˉ(fn,f)≤2η≤ε/2<ε, for every n≥K.

step 1.2step 4.1L1
6.1

As ε was an arbitrary positive real, step 5.1 says fn→f in (YX,ρˉ); so every ρˉ-Cauchy sequence converges in YX, which is claim 1.

step 5.1L4
7.1

For claim 2, C(X,Y) is closed in the complete space (YX,ρˉ), so the metric subspace C(X,Y) with the restriction of ρˉ is complete.

step 6.1L6L7∎

Remarks

  • What completeness of the target buys, pointwise and then uniformly. Step 3.1 produces the limit function pointwise, and that step alone would hold for a merely pointwise Cauchy condition. What the uniform Cauchy condition adds is step 5.1: the same η works at every x, so the bound on dˉ(fn(x),f(x)) is uniform in x and therefore bounds the supremum.

  • Step 4.1 chooses nothing. For each fixed x an index m is instantiated and used inside the same sentence; the conclusion dˉ(fn(x),f(x))<2η does not mention m, so no function x↦m is ever formed. That is the standard way this library avoids a spurious countable choice.

  • Completeness is a property of the metric, not of the topology (Complete metric space: every Cauchy sequence converges in the space), and the metric here is ρˉ, built from the truncation dˉ=min⁡{d,1}. A different metric inducing the same topology on Y need not make Y complete, and then nothing above applies; the hypothesis is that (Y,d) itself is complete.

  • The classical special case. With Y=R this says that the bounded-or-not real functions on a nonempty set are complete in the uniform metric, and that the continuous ones form a closed, hence complete, subspace. The companion page works C([0,1],R) explicitly and compares the uniform metric there with the supremum metric of The supremum metric d∞(f,g)=sup⁡x∣f(x)−g(x)∣ is a metric on the bounded real-valued functions on a nonempty set.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

72 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources