Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-generatedSession-authored (Fable 5 assisted)precheck passjudge pass (z-ai/glm-5.2)audited 2026-07-29
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

If (Y,d)(Y,d) is complete then YXY^{X} is complete in the uniform metric, and so is C(X,Y)C(X,Y)

Statement

Let XX be a nonempty set, let (Y,d)(Y,d) be a complete metric space (Complete metric space: every Cauchy sequence converges in the space) and let ρˉ\bar\rho be the uniform metric on YXY^{X} (For a nonempty set XX and a metric space (Y,d)(Y,d) the uniform metric ρˉ(f,g)=supxmin{d(f(x),g(x)),1}\bar\rho(f,g) = \sup_{x} \min\{d(f(x),g(x)), 1\} is a metric on YXY^{X}). Then:

  1. (YX,ρˉ)(Y^{X}, \bar\rho) is a complete metric space.
  2. If in addition XX carries a topology, then C(X,Y)C(X,Y) with the restriction of ρˉ\bar\rho (Uniform convergence, and the topology of uniform convergence: the metric topology of the uniform metric on YXY^{X} and on C(X,Y)C(X,Y)) is a complete metric space.

No choice principle is used. The limit function is defined by a formula, not chosen: a Cauchy sequence in a complete metric space has exactly one limit (A sequence in a metric space has at most one limit), so xlimkfk(x)x \mapsto \lim_k f_k(x) is a function, and nothing is selected.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A nonempty set XX, a complete metric space (Y,d)(Y,d), the truncated metric dˉ=min{d,1}\bar d = \min\{d,1\} on YY, the uniform metric ρˉ\bar\rho on YXY^{X}, and a ρˉ\bar\rho-Cauchy sequence (fk)(f_k) in YXY^{X}.

[L1]

dˉd\bar d \le d and dˉ1\bar d \le 1; if dˉ(u,v)<1\bar d(u,v) < 1 then dˉ(u,v)=d(u,v)\bar d(u,v) = d(u,v); and dˉ(u(x),v(x))ρˉ(u,v)\bar d(u(x),v(x)) \le \bar\rho(u,v) for every xXx \in X, while any real bounding all the values dˉ(u(x),v(x))\bar d(u(x),v(x)) above bounds ρˉ(u,v)\bar\rho(u,v) (min(d,1)\min(d,1) and d/(1+d)d/(1+d) are metrics uniformly equivalent to dd, so every metric space carries a bounded metric with the same topology, For a nonempty set XX and a metric space (Y,d)(Y,d) the uniform metric ρˉ(f,g)=supxmin{d(f(x),g(x)),1}\bar\rho(f,g) = \sup_{x} \min\{d(f(x),g(x)), 1\} is a metric on YXY^{X}, Every nonempty finite set of reals has a maximum and a minimum, Maximum and minimum of a set, Complete ordered field (least-upper-bound property), Suprema and infima are unique).

[L2]

(xk)(x_k) is Cauchy in a metric space when for every real ε>0\varepsilon > 0 there is KK with the distance between xmx_m and xnx_n below ε\varepsilon for all m,nKm, n \ge K; the rational and real tests agree (Cauchy sequence in a metric space, The rationals embed densely in the reals).

[L4]

xkpx_k \to p in a metric space means: for every real ε>0\varepsilon > 0 there is KK with the distance from xkx_k to pp below ε\varepsilon for every kKk \ge K (Convergence of a sequence in a metric space: xkxx_k \to x iff d(xk,x)0d(x_k, x) \to 0 in R\mathbb{R}, Open ball, closed ball and sphere in a metric space, The rationals embed densely in the reals).

[L6]

C(X,Y)C(X,Y) is a closed subset of (YX,ρˉ)(Y^{X},\bar\rho) when XX is a nonempty topological space (A uniform limit of continuous functions is continuous, so C(X,Y)C(X,Y) is closed in YXY^{X} under the uniform metric, claim 3).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

Let xXx \in X and let ε>0\varepsilon > 0 be real; put η:=min{ε,1}/2\eta := \min\{\varepsilon, 1\}/2, a real with 0<η1/2<10 < \eta \le 1/2 < 1 and η<ε\eta < \varepsilon, and take KK with ρˉ(fm,fn)<η\bar\rho(f_m,f_n) < \eta for all m,nKm,n \ge K.

givenL1L2choose
1.2

Let ε>0\varepsilon > 0 be real; put η:=min{ε,1}/4\eta := \min\{\varepsilon,1\}/4, a real with 0<η1/4<10 < \eta \le 1/4 < 1 and 4ηε4\eta \le \varepsilon, and take KK with ρˉ(fm,fn)<η\bar\rho(f_m,f_n) < \eta for all m,nKm,n \ge K.

givenL1L2choose
2.1

For m,nKm, n \ge K: dˉ(fm(x),fn(x))ρˉ(fm,fn)<η<1\bar d(f_m(x),f_n(x)) \le \bar\rho(f_m,f_n) < \eta < 1, hence d(fm(x),fn(x))=dˉ(fm(x),fn(x))<η<εd(f_m(x),f_n(x)) = \bar d(f_m(x),f_n(x)) < \eta < \varepsilon.

step 1.1L1
3.1

As ε\varepsilon was an arbitrary positive real, step 2.1 makes (fk(x))(f_k(x)) a dd-Cauchy sequence in YY for every xXx \in X; by completeness it converges, and its limit is unique, so f(x):=limkfk(x)f(x) := \lim_k f_k(x) defines a function fYXf \in Y^{X} with no selection made.

step 2.1L2L3L8
4.1

Fix nKn \ge K and xXx \in X; since fm(x)f(x)f_m(x) \to f(x) in (Y,d)(Y,d) and dˉd\bar d \le d, there is mKm \ge K with dˉ(fm(x),f(x))<η\bar d(f_m(x), f(x)) < \eta, and then dˉ(fn(x),f(x))dˉ(fn(x),fm(x))+dˉ(fm(x),f(x))<η+η=2η\bar d(f_n(x), f(x)) \le \bar d(f_n(x), f_m(x)) + \bar d(f_m(x), f(x)) < \eta + \eta = 2\eta.

step 3.1step 1.2L1L4L5
5.1

Step 4.1 holds for every xXx \in X, so 2η2\eta bounds the values dˉ(fn(x),f(x))\bar d(f_n(x),f(x)) above and hence ρˉ(fn,f)2ηε/2<ε\bar\rho(f_n,f) \le 2\eta \le \varepsilon/2 < \varepsilon, for every nKn \ge K.

step 1.2step 4.1L1
6.1

As ε\varepsilon was an arbitrary positive real, step 5.1 says fnff_n \to f in (YX,ρˉ)(Y^{X},\bar\rho); so every ρˉ\bar\rho-Cauchy sequence converges in YXY^{X}, which is claim 1.

step 5.1L4
7.1

For claim 2, C(X,Y)C(X,Y) is closed in the complete space (YX,ρˉ)(Y^{X},\bar\rho), so the metric subspace C(X,Y)C(X,Y) with the restriction of ρˉ\bar\rho is complete.

step 6.1L6L7

Remarks

  • What completeness of the target buys, pointwise and then uniformly. Step 3.1 produces the limit function pointwise, and that step alone would hold for a merely pointwise Cauchy condition. What the uniform Cauchy condition adds is step 5.1: the same η\eta works at every xx, so the bound on dˉ(fn(x),f(x))\bar d(f_n(x),f(x)) is uniform in xx and therefore bounds the supremum.

  • Step 4.1 chooses nothing. For each fixed xx an index mm is instantiated and used inside the same sentence; the conclusion dˉ(fn(x),f(x))<2η\bar d(f_n(x),f(x)) < 2\eta does not mention mm, so no function xmx \mapsto m is ever formed. That is the standard way this library avoids a spurious countable choice.

  • Completeness is a property of the metric, not of the topology (Complete metric space: every Cauchy sequence converges in the space), and the metric here is ρˉ\bar\rho, built from the truncation dˉ=min{d,1}\bar d = \min\{d,1\}. A different metric inducing the same topology on YY need not make YY complete, and then nothing above applies; the hypothesis is that (Y,d)(Y,d) itself is complete.

  • The classical special case. With Y=RY = \mathbb{R} this says that the bounded-or-not real functions on a nonempty set are complete in the uniform metric, and that the continuous ones form a closed, hence complete, subspace. The companion page works C([0,1],R)C([0,1],\mathbb{R}) explicitly and compares the uniform metric there with the supremum metric of The supremum metric d(f,g)=supxf(x)g(x)d_\infty(f,g) = \sup_x |f(x) - g(x)| is a metric on the bounded real-valued functions on a nonempty set.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · next 3 levels

Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 139 results over 37 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.

Sources