Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Zero Gaussian partial correlation is conditional independence

Statement

Assume AC. Let X∼Np(μ,Σ) be a nondegenerate multivariate-normal vector, so Σ is positive definite. For distinct i,j and S⊆{1,…,p}∖{i,j}, the block Kij∣S in the definition of Gaussian partial correlation is positive definite, and ρij∣S=0⟺σ(Xi)⊥ ⁣ ⁣ ⁣⊥σ(Xj)∣σ(XS).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: AC, a positive-definite Gaussian covariance matrix, and the indices i,j,S in the Statement.

[F1]

A finite vector is multivariate normal when every linear projection is a univariate normal with the corresponding projected mean and variance; its covariance is the stated matrix. Multivariate normal law, including singular covariance

[F2]

A positive-definite multivariate-normal law has density proportional to exp⁡(−12(x−μ)TΣ−1(x−μ)). A positive-definite multivariate normal law has its Gaussian density

[F3]

Conditional independence is the conditional-product identity for every pair of bounded measurable real functions. Conditional independence given a sigma-algebra

[F4]

Finite random vectors use the finite product sigma-algebra. The product sigma-algebra and its finite iterates

[F5]

Independence of random elements means independence of their generated sigma-algebras. Independent random elements

[A1]

AC is assumed, as required by [F1]–[F3]. The Axiom of Choice

Proof

Given: The hypotheses in the Statement.

1.1givenF1A1construct

Partition X=(Y,Z) with Y=(Xi,Xj) and Z=XS; if S=∅, omit the Z block. For nonempty S, ΣS,S is positive definite because every nonzero vector supported on S has positive Σ-quadratic form, so it is invertible. Put A=ΣY,SΣS,S−1 and U=Y−μY−A(Z−μZ). Then Cov⁡(U,Z)=0 and Cov⁡(U)=Kij∣S. For every nonzero u∈R2, the quadratic form of Σ at (u,−ΣS,S−1ΣS,Yu) equals uTKij∣Su>0. Thus Kij∣S is positive definite; for empty S this follows directly from the principal 2×2 covariance block.

2.1F1F2F4F5step 1.1algebra

The vector (U,Z) is a linear image of X, hence is jointly Gaussian by [F1]. Its covariance is block diagonal with blocks Kij∣S and ΣS,S. By [F2], the joint density factors as the product of the two Gaussian densities, since the inverse and determinant of a block-diagonal covariance split by blocks. Integrating over measurable rectangles shows U and Z are independent by [F5]. It follows that, conditionally on Z, Y is the translate μY+A(Z−μZ)+U and has conditional covariance Kij∣S.

3.1F2F3F5step 2.1

If (Kij∣S)12=0, the positive-definite bivariate Gaussian density of U factors into its one-coordinate densities. Thus the coordinates of U are independent. Since U is independent of Z, the conditional law of Xi,Xj given Z is the product of its conditional marginals. Integrating bounded measurable functions against this product conditional law gives the identity in [F3], hence conditional independence.

3.2F3step 2.1algebra

Conversely assume the conditional independence in the Statement. Apply [F3] to the sine and cosine functions of each coordinate and combine the four real identities to obtain factorization of the conditional characteristic function at (1,1). By step 2.1, the joint conditional characteristic function is the product of the marginal factors times exp⁡(−(Kij∣S)12). All other factors are nonzero; therefore exp⁡(−(Kij∣S)12)=1. The covariance entry is real, so (Kij∣S)12=0.

4.1step 1.1step 3.1step 3.2algebra∎

The diagonal entries of Kij∣S are positive by step 1.1. Its off-diagonal entry is zero exactly when the normalized entry ρij∣S is zero, proving both implications.

Depends on

Used by

Cited to discharge well-definedness by Gaussian partial correlation.

Dependency tree · two levels

39 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources