How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The centered Hardy-Littlewood maximal operator is weak type
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Countable Choice (The Axiom of Countable Choice ()).
Let and let . Then In particular, the centered maximal operator is of weak type .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The Axiom of Countable Choice, a function , and a real number .
The centered maximal function is (The centered and uncentered Hardy-Littlewood maximal functions)
For a locally integrable function, the ball-average map is continuous on . (Ball averages vary continuously with the centre and radius)
Lebesgue measure on is inner regular by compact sets on open sets. (Assuming countable choice, the Lebesgue measure of a measurable set is the supremum of the measures of its compact subsets)
A finite family of balls admits a disjoint subfamily whose fivefold dilates cover the original union, with the measure estimate (Vitali covering lemma for Euclidean balls with fivefold dilates)
The norm is (The class of integrable functions)
Proof
Put . If , then [L1] gives a radius such that By [L2] applied to at , there is such that the same strict inequality holds with replaced by every and the radius kept equal to . Hence , so is open. Now let [L1, L2, given, choose] be compact. The balls with cover , so compactness yields a finite subcover .
Apply [L4] to that finite subcover. There are pairwise disjoint balls [step 1.1, L4, L5, algebra] among such that and therefore Each chosen ball still satisfies the witness inequality from step 1.1, so because the chosen balls are pairwise disjoint. Hence
By [L3], the open set is the supremum of the measures of its compact [step 2.1, L3, algebra] subsets. Step 2.1 gives the same upper bound for every compact , so
This is exactly the weak type estimate for the centered maximal [step 3.1] operator.
Depends on
- The centered and uncentered Hardy-Littlewood maximal functions
- The Axiom of Countable Choice ($\mathrm{AC}_\omega$)
- The class $L^1(\mu)$ of integrable functions
- Ball averages vary continuously with the centre and radius
- Assuming countable choice, the Lebesgue measure of a measurable set is the supremum of the measures of its compact subsets
- Vitali covering lemma for Euclidean balls with fivefold dilates
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
33 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Terence Tao, An Introduction to Measure Theory, Theorem 1.6.20 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Gerald B. Folland, Real Analysis: Modern Techniques and Their Applications, 2nd ed., Theorem 3.17 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Walter Rudin, Real and Complex Analysis, 3rd ed., Theorem 7.4 (standard reference, not scraped)