How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Vitali covering lemma for Euclidean balls with fivefold dilates
Statement
For a ball , write .
-
Let be a finite family of Euclidean balls in . Then there is a pairwise disjoint subfamily such that Consequently,
-
Let be a countable family of Euclidean balls whose radii are bounded above. Then there is a finite or countably infinite index set such that is pairwise disjoint and
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A family of Euclidean balls in .
The Euclidean balls are the sets . (Open ball, closed ball and sphere in a metric space)
Lebesgue measure scales by under dilation by . In particular, for every ball , (For a nonzero real , dilation by multiplies Lebesgue outer measure by , and reflection in the origin preserves it)
Proof
For the finite family, choose with maximal radius among [given, choose] . Having chosen disjoint balls , choose with maximal radius among the remaining balls disjoint from all earlier choices, and stop when none remain. The chosen subfamily is pairwise disjoint by construction.
Now let be countable with radii bounded above, and put For each integer , let Process the classes in this order, and within each class inspect the indices in increasing order. Retain exactly when it is disjoint from every ball already retained. The retained subfamily is pairwise disjoint by construction.
Let be one of the original balls. If it was chosen, then [step 1.1, L1, choose, algebra] . If it was not chosen, let be the first chosen ball that meets it. Since the choice at stage had maximal radius among the remaining disjoint balls, the radius of is at most that of . Pick and choose . Then so . Therefore every original ball lies in the union of the fivefold dilates of the chosen balls.
Let be any original ball that was not chosen in the countable construction, and let . When the algorithm inspected , some previously chosen ball already met ; otherwise would have been retained. If with , then If instead , then both balls lie in the same dyadic class, so In either case, Choose and . Then so again . Let be the set of retained indices. This set is finite or countably infinite, and chosen balls are also contained in their own fivefold dilates; hence
Since the chosen balls are pairwise disjoint, [step 2.1, L2, algebra] This proves part 1.
Steps 3.1 and 2.2 prove the finite and countable forms.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
24 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Terence Tao, An Introduction to Measure Theory, Lemma 1.6.22 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Gerald B. Folland, Real Analysis: Modern Techniques and Their Applications, 2nd ed., Lemma 3.15 (standard reference, not scraped)