How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Hausdorff dimension is the unique critical exponent
Statement
Write . For finite exponents ,
Moreover
where all tested exponents are finite, and the supremum is in , so . If , then . The ray assertions impose no value at a finite critical exponent itself.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The objects, conventions, and hypotheses in the statement above.
Dimension is the infimum of the zero-measure exponents with empty infimum infinity. Hausdorff dimension
Finite measure at an exponent forces zero measure at every larger finite exponent. Increasing the exponent past finite measure gives zero
Proof
If and were finite, choose a finite strictly between and (also possible for ). Then , contrary to being the infimum of the zero exponents. Hence .
If , the zero-exponent set is nonempty and contains by its infimum property. Exponent comparison gives . Thus when all positive exponents vanish, and when every finite exponent has infinite measure.
The first two steps place every finite-measure exponent at least , and every exponent strictly greater than finite among the finite-measure exponents. Their infimum is , also when the set is empty. Similarly the infinite-measure exponents lie at most and contain every nonnegative exponent strictly below . Their supremum is ; for it is zero whether that set is empty or consists of zero. Finite positive measure at excludes and , hence forces equality. Empty has and no infinite-measure exponent.
Depends on
Used by
- Euclidean space and positive-volume sets have their Euclidean dimension Corollary
- Lipschitz monotonicity and bi-Lipschitz invariance of dimension Corollary
- An uncountable compact set can have dimension zero Counterexample
- A Lipschitz graph has finite Hausdorff length Example
- A planar segment has Hausdorff measure equal to length Example
- A Sierpinski gasket computed by hand Example
- The fat Cantor set has positive length and dimension one Example
- Continuous injections preserve Hausdorff dimension False statement
- Digit-position density determines Hausdorff dimension Proposition
- Hausdorff dimension is monotone and countably stable Theorem
- The Cantor set has dimension log 2 / log 3 and critical measure one Theorem
- The mass distribution principle Theorem
Cited to discharge well-definedness by Hausdorff dimension.
Dependency tree · two levels
5 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Bishop–Peres Proposition 1.2.6; Fremlin 264Yk (standard reference, not scraped)