Alphabeta Math
False statementConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-07
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Continuous injections preserve Hausdorff dimension

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Countable Choice. The assertion “continuous injections preserve Hausdorff dimension” is false even for a homeomorphism between compact metric spaces. On I=[0,1], put d(x,y)=xy and ρ(x,y)=xy. The identity from (I,d) to (I,ρ) is a homeomorphism, but the dimensions are one and two respectively.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The objects, conventions, and hypotheses in the statement above.

[F1]

Scale Hausdorff values infimise diameter powers over arbitrary nonempty sets, with the specified zero-exponent convention. Hausdorff content at a prescribed scale

[F2]

Under the standing Countable Choice hypothesis, for every subset AR, H1(A)=λ1(A). One-dimensional Hausdorff measure on the line is Lebesgue outer measure

[F3]

Finite positive measure at exponent t identifies dimension t. Hausdorff dimension is the unique critical exponent

Refutation

1.1

Nonnegativity, symmetry and separation for ρ follow from those for d. For the triangle inequality, a+ba+b for a,b0, because squaring the right side gives a+b+2aba+b. Apply this to the triangle inequality for d. Also Bρ(x,r)=Bd(x,r2) for every r>0, so both metrics have identical open sets and the identity is a homeomorphism. The usual compact interval is therefore compact in both metrics.

given
1.2

For every subset UI, diamρU=(diamdU)1/2; for nonempty sets this follows from monotonicity and continuity of the square root applied to the supremum of distances, and for the empty set both sides are zero. Thus for t0 and δ>0, the same cover families give Hρ,δt(I)=Hd,δ2t/2(I). Nonempty singleton costs match also when t=0. Passing to the small-scale suprema yields Hρt(I)=Hdt/2(I). Covers in the line may be intersected with I without increasing their costs, and covers in I are line covers, so the usual ambient and subspace values agree.

F1
2.1

The unit interval has Lebesgue length one. At t=2 the preceding identity gives Hρ2(I)=Hd1(I)=1. The finite-positive criterion gives dimensions two and one in the two metrics. The identity is bijective and hence injective, so this is a counterexample to the asserted invariance.

F2F3step 1.1step 1.2

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

12 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources