Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-07
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

One-dimensional Hausdorff measure on the line is Lebesgue outer measure

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Countable Choice. For every AR,

H1(A)=λ1(A).

Consequently their Carathéodory measurable domains and completed measures agree.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The objects, conventions, and hypotheses in the statement above.

[F1]

Under the standing Countable Choice hypothesis, for every subset of the line, λ1(A)H1(A). Elementary lower and upper bounds on a unit cube

[F2]

Lebesgue outer measure is the infimum of total elementary volumes of countable elementary-set covers. Lebesgue outer measure on Rn

[F3]

Hausdorff measure is the supremum of scale covering costs. Unnormalised Hausdorff measure

Proof

1.1

Only the reverse inequality needs proof. If λ1(A)=, the lower inequality already gives equality. Otherwise choose an elementary-set cover of total volume less than λ1(A)+ε. Each finite-volume elementary set is a finite disjoint union of bounded half-open intervals; zero-volume empty pieces can be discarded. This is the elementary algebra and its volume appearing in the defining infimum.

F1F2
2.1

Fix δ>0. Subdivide each such interval into finitely many half-open intervals of lengths at most δ, without changing the sum of lengths. Flatten the resulting countable family. It is an admissible Hausdorff cover of cost at most λ1(A)+ε. Hence Hδ1(A)λ1(A) after letting ε decrease to zero. Taking the supremum over δ proves equality. For empty A use the empty cover.

F2F3step 1.1
3.1

For every test set T the two outer values in the Carathéodory splitting identity are identical. Thus a set satisfies that identity for one outer measure if and only if it does for the other, and the restricted values agree. Both restrictions are their complete Carathéodory measures.

step 2.1

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

12 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources