Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-07
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Elementary lower and upper bounds on a unit cube

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Countable Choice. For every integer n≥1 and A⊆Rn in the Euclidean metric,

λn∗(A)≤Hn(A),1≤Hn((0,1]n)≤nn/2.

Only coordinate boxes, not the isodiametric inequality, are needed.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The objects, conventions, and hypotheses in the statement above.

[F1]

Hausdorff measure is the supremum of diameter-power covering infima. Unnormalised Hausdorff measure

[F2]

Under Countable Choice Lebesgue outer measure is countably subadditive and agrees with elementary volume. Assuming countable choice, Lebesgue outer measure is an outer measure that restricts to elementary volume

[F3]

Under the standing Countable Choice hypothesis, a finite coordinate box of any endpoint convention has measure the product of its side lengths, including zero side lengths. A box in Rn with parameters ai≤bi is Lebesgue measurable of measure ∏i<n(bi−ai), whichever of its faces are included

Proof

1.1F2F3

If a nonempty bounded U has diameter r, its ith coordinate ranges between an infimum ai and supremum bi with bi−ai≤r. Hence U⊆∏i[ai,bi] and λn∗(U)≤∏i(bi−ai)≤rn. If r=0 this is a zero-volume singleton box.

2.1F1F2step 1.1

For every finite-scale cover of A, countable subadditivity gives λn∗(A)≤∑j(diam⁡Uj)n. Infimising and then taking the small-scale supremum gives the lower bound; absent covers give the same inequality with infinity on the right. The empty set has both values zero.

3.1F1F3F4step 2.1∎

Partition (0,1]n into mn half-open cubes of side 1/m. Each has diameter n/m (the supremum of corner distances), so the total cost is mn(n/m)n=nn/2. Choose m large for any prescribed positive scale. Thus the upper bound holds, while the lower bound is the unit box volume one. For n=1 both bounds equal one.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

29 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources