How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The dual of a finite-dimensional Hopf algebra is a Hopf algebra
Statement
Let be a field and a finite-dimensional Hopf -algebra. Give the transposed Hopf structure: multiplication is convolution,
the unit is , coproduct is the transpose under finite tensor duality, the counit is , and the antipode is . Then is a Hopf algebra. No bijectivity assumption on is required.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A field and a finite-dimensional Hopf -algebra , with the structural maps in the Statement.
Hopf algebras and antipodes: a Hopf algebra is a bialgebra with antipode satisfying both convolution equations; no bijectivity is required.
Finite-dimensional algebra-coalgebra duality: for finite-dimensional algebras and coalgebras, full duality transposes multiplication/unit and coproduct/counit, reverses structure maps, and identifies each object with its bidual.
Finite tensor duality and basis-independent coevaluation: for finite-dimensional , , and the isomorphism is induced by .
Bialgebras and bialgebra maps: and are unital algebra maps, and the tensor-product algebra uses .
Counit uniqueness and finite Sweedler calculus: Sweedler notation records a finite tensor expression, and every contraction is a well-defined linear map on that tensor.
Proof
Since is finite-dimensional, [F3] identifies with ; thus for each , the transpose is a tensor characterized by . The same finite tensor duality for permits transposing every structural identity in [F1] and [F2].
The convolution product on is associative: evaluating and on gives respectively through the two iterated coproducts of , which agree by coassociativity; the counit identities make its left and right unit.
The coproduct on is coassociative because evaluating and on gives and , equal by associativity of ; evaluation at is a two-sided counit by .
The coproduct on preserves convolution products: for and , where the second equality uses that is an algebra map. Finite tensor duality makes equality on all equality of tensors.
The unit is group-like for , since ; the counit preserves convolution products because . Thus the maps in the Statement make a bialgebra.
Define . If , then for , The last equality is the left antipode equation in [F1]; this is the left antipode equation for in .
Likewise, using the right antipode equation in [F1]. Both convolution equations hold, so is an antipode on , and no step uses .
Depends on
- Hopf algebras and antipodes
- Scalars, tensor powers, the empty tensor, opposite algebras and finite sums
- Associator naturality, pentagon, unit triangle and symmetry hexagons on elementary tensors
- Finite-dimensional algebra-coalgebra duality
- Finite tensor duality and basis-independent coevaluation
- Bialgebras and bialgebra maps
- Counit uniqueness and finite Sweedler calculus
Used by
- Finite Drinfeld double: convention and candidate multiplication Definition
- Left and right integrals and integral functionals Definition
- The dual Hopf algebra of a finite group algebra Example
- Double coalgebra, multiplicativity, and antipode Lemma
- The finite dual is a right regular Hopf module Lemma
- Finite Hopf algebras have one-dimensional integral spaces and bijective antipode Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
30 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Kalle Kytölä, Introduction to Hopf algebras and representations, §§3.8–3.9 (standard reference, not scraped)