Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck pending
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The order-n Hochschild obstruction to extending a partial star product

Statement

Let M be a smooth manifold (Smooth manifolds and their smooth charts) and A=C∞(M,R), and let n≥2. Suppose B1,…,Bn−1 are normalized bidifferential 2-cochains and that the truncated product f⋆<ng=fg+∑r=1n−1ℏrBr(f,g) is associative modulo ℏn. For i+j=n, put On(f,g,h):=∑i=1n−1(Bi(Bn−i(f,g),h)−Bi(f,Bn−i(g,h))). Then On is a normalized multidifferential Hochschild 3-cocycle. The truncated product extends associatively modulo ℏn+1 by a normalized bidifferential coefficient Bn exactly when [On]=0 in the cohomology HHdiff,norm3(A,A) defined in Hochschild cochains, differential, and Gerstenhaber insertion bracket. Equivalently, δBn=On. With the Gerstenhaber bracket convention in that definition, On=12∑i+j=n[Bi,Bj]G, where both indices range from 1 to n−1. In particular, O2=12[B1,B1]G. This is a coefficientwise extension criterion at one finite order; it gives no automatic extension at later orders and no general existence or formality theorem.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A smooth manifold M, A=C∞(M,R), n≥2, normalized bidifferential cochains B1,…,Bn−1, and associativity of ⋆<n through all powers below ℏn.

[A1]

n is an integer at least 2; all coefficients and cochains are over R, so 2 and 3 are invertible.

[F1]

Coefficientwise formal associative deformations: the coefficientwise product uses finite sums at each formal order and associativity is equality of each coefficient.

[F2]

Hochschild cochains, differential, and Gerstenhaber insertion bracket: the Hochschild differential δ, normalized multidifferential subcomplex, and Gerstenhaber insertion bracket have the displayed formulas.

[F3]

The shifted Hochschild cochains form a differential graded Lie algebra: with ∂=[m,−]G, the shifted cochains form a differential graded Lie algebra and ∂Br=−δBr for 2-cochains, while ∂On=δOn for 3-cochains.

Proof

1.1givenA1F1F2algebra

Let m(f,g)=fg and x=∑r=1n−1ℏrBr, so m+x is the truncated product. For arity-two cochains the insertion formula gives 12[m+x,m+x]G(f,g,h)=((f⋆<ng)⋆<nh)−f⋆<n(g⋆<nh). Thus its coefficient at order n, where there is no Bn term, is precisely the displayed On; all lower coefficients vanish by the assumed partial associativity. The same insertion formula gives 12∑i+j=n[Bi,Bj]G=∑i+j=nBi∘Bj=On, because the bracket of two 2-cochains is symmetric.

2.1A1F3step 1.1algebra

In the shifted Hochschild DGLA put R=∂x+12[x,x]G=12[m+x,m+x]G; the last equality uses [m,m]G=0. The DGLA identities give the Bianchi identity ∂R+[x,R]G=12∂[x,x]G+[x,∂x]G+12[x,[x,x]G]G=0. Indeed, the derivation rule and graded skew-symmetry make the first two terms cancel, and graded Jacobi gives 3[x,[x,x]G]G=0, hence the last term vanishes over R. By step 1.1, R starts at order ℏn with coefficient On, while x starts at order ℏ; therefore the coefficient of ℏn in the Bianchi identity is ∂On=0.

2.2A1F2F3step 1.1algebra

By [F3], ∂ on 3-cochains is δ, so δOn=0. Each summand of On is a composition of normalized bidifferential cochains. An input equal to 1 either makes the inner cochain vanish or remains a unit input of the outer cochain; composition also preserves finite differential order. Thus On lies in the stated normalized multidifferential subcomplex.

2.3A1F1F2step 1.1algebra

Add ℏnBn to the truncated product. The order-n terms in its associator that are linear in Bn are Bn(f,g)h+Bn(fg,h)−fBn(g,h)−Bn(f,gh)=−(δBn)(f,g,h). No term quadratic in Bn, or involving Bn and a positive-order coefficient, contributes at order n, since those terms have order at least 2n or n+1. Hence the new order-n associator coefficient is On−δBn.

3.1F2step 2.2step 2.3algebra∎

The lower associator coefficients already vanish. Therefore ⋆<n+ℏnBn is associative modulo ℏn+1 exactly when δBn=On. By step 2.2, On is a cocycle in the normalized multidifferential complex; such a Bn exists precisely when its cohomology class is zero. For n=2, the defining sum has only (i,j)=(1,1), yielding O2=12[B1,B1]G. This proves the finite-order criterion without asserting that later obstruction classes vanish.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

10 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources