Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-22
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Variational characterisation of the nearest point

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Countable Choice. Let H be a real or complex Hilbert space, let CH be closed and convex with xH, and let pC. Then p is the nearest point of C to x if and only if

Rexp, yp0for every yC.

In particular, for the nearest point the inequality holds, and conversely any pC satisfying the inequality is nearest.

Facts & Assumptions

[A1]

C is convex: p+t(yp)C for yC and 0t1; and p is nearest exactly when xpxy for every yC (Convex sets and continuous real-hyperplane separation in a normed space).

[A2]

The pairing is linear in the first argument and conjugate-linear in the second, with v2=v,v (Real and complex inner-product spaces and their induced length).

[A3]

Countable Choice is the selection principle consumed by the existence theorem for nearest points (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)).

Proof

technique · direct

Given: Countable Choice, a closed convex set C, a vector x and a point pC.

1.1

Suppose first that p is nearest, and let yC; for every t with 0<t1 the convexity hypothesis gives p+t(yp)C, so xp2xpt(yp)2=xp22tRexp,yp+t2yp2, whence 2Rexp,yptyp2, and if Rexp,yp were positive the choice t<min{1, 2Rexp,yp/(yp2+1)} would make the right-hand side strictly smaller than the left, a contradiction; hence Rexp,yp0.

A1A2algebra
1.2

Conversely suppose Rexp,yp0 for every yC; then xy2=(xp)+(py)2=xp2+2Rexp,py+py2xp2, because Rexp,py=Rexp,yp0.

A1A2algebra
2.1

Steps 1.1 and 1.2 prove both implications of the stated equivalence; the Countable Choice hypothesis is used only to invoke the existence theorem for nearest points (Projection onto a nonempty closed convex set) when the nearest point is not supplied, while the equivalence itself is choice-free for a given p.

step 1.1step 1.2A3

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

26 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources