How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Variational characterisation of the nearest point
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Countable Choice. Let be a real or complex Hilbert space, let be closed and convex with , and let . Then is the nearest point of to if and only if
In particular, for the nearest point the inequality holds, and conversely any satisfying the inequality is nearest.
Facts & Assumptions
is convex: for and ; and is nearest exactly when for every (Convex sets and continuous real-hyperplane separation in a normed space).
The pairing is linear in the first argument and conjugate-linear in the second, with (Real and complex inner-product spaces and their induced length).
Countable Choice is the selection principle consumed by the existence theorem for nearest points (The Axiom of Countable Choice ()).
Proof
Given: Countable Choice, a closed convex set , a vector and a point .
Suppose first that is nearest, and let ; for every with the convexity hypothesis gives , so , whence , and if were positive the choice would make the right-hand side strictly smaller than the left, a contradiction; hence .
Conversely suppose for every ; then , because .
Steps 1.1 and 1.2 prove both implications of the stated equivalence; the Countable Choice hypothesis is used only to invoke the existence theorem for nearest points (Projection onto a nonempty closed convex set) when the nearest point is not supplied, while the equivalence itself is choice-free for a given .
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
26 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Theo Bühler and Dietmar Salamon, Functional Analysis, Theorem 1.44, pp.40–41 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Andrew Lin and Casey Rodriguez, MIT 18.102 Introduction to Functional Analysis, Theorem 178 (standard reference, not scraped)