How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Covariant and contravariant are left exact
Statement
Let be a left -module.
- If is exact, then is exact.
- If is exact, then is exact.
Thus covariant and contravariant are left exact.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The two exact sequences in the statement and a left -module .
Postcomposition and precomposition define the displayed homomorphisms on Hom groups (The abelian group and maps induced by pre- and postcomposition).
Exactness means equality of the incoming image and outgoing kernel; the zero endpoints make injective in the first sequence and surjective in the second (Exact sequences and short exact sequences of modules).
If a homomorphism vanishes on a submodule , it factors uniquely through (A module homomorphism vanishing on factors uniquely through ).
Proof
If , then for every , and injectivity of gives ; hence is injective.
Composability gives , so .
If satisfies , then for every . Injectivity of gives a unique with ; uniqueness makes linear, so .
If , surjectivity of gives , so is injective; and because .
If satisfies , then vanishes on . By [L1] it factors uniquely through , and since is surjective the rule gives the corresponding homomorphism with .
Steps 1.1 to 1.3 prove the covariant sequence exact, and steps 1.4 and 1.5 prove the contravariant sequence exact.
Depends on
Used by
- Hom_ℤ(-,ℤ) need not preserve surjections on the right Counterexample
- The invariants functor is left exact Proposition
- The published module statement is the instance of this corollary Remark
- Equivalent characterizations of injective modules Theorem
- Equivalent characterizations of projective modules Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
8 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- A. Kleshchev, Lectures on Abstract Algebra for Graduate Students, sections 3.6, 3.14, and 3.15 (standard reference, not scraped)
- The Stacks Project, Algebra (standard reference, not scraped)
- P. Hekmati, Homological Algebra, section 3.1 (standard reference, not scraped)