How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
In a strict braided monoidal category the braiding satisfies the Yang-Baxter equation
Statement
Let be a strict braided monoidal category. Then for all objects ,
In particular, when , both sides are endomorphisms of , and the relation becomes
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A strict braided monoidal category.
A braided monoidal category carries a braiding satisfying the two hexagon identities (Braided monoidal category).
In a strict monoidal category, the associator and both unitors are identity morphisms (Strict monoidal category).
Proof
By [L2], both hexagon identities from [L1] lose all associators. They become and .
Naturality of with respect to the morphism gives
Expand the left-hand occurrence of in step 2.1 by the first formula of step 1.1, and expand by the same formula with and interchanged. This yields which is the stated Yang-Baxter relation. The special case is the displayed braid equation.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
4 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- P. Etingof, S. Gelaki, D. Nikshych, and V. Ostrik, Tensor Categories, Proposition 8.1.10 (standard reference, not scraped)