How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The braiding is compatible with the unit constraints
Statement
Let be a braiding on a monoidal category . Then for every object ,
and consequently
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A braided monoidal category with braiding .
In any braided monoidal category, Exercise 8.1.6 of EGNO derives the identities
A braiding is, in particular, a family of isomorphisms satisfying the hexagons (Braiding).
Proof
The present hypotheses are exactly those of [F1], so the two displayed unit-compatibility identities hold for every object .
By [L1], the morphisms and are isomorphisms. Step 1.1 therefore gives These two formulas are inverse to each other, so .
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
6 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- P. Etingof, S. Gelaki, D. Nikshych, and V. Ostrik, Tensor Categories, Exercise 8.1.6 (standard reference, not scraped)