How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Independent-group terminal influence limit
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice. Fix a finite and . For each total sample size , let be positive deterministic integers with , and suppose with . For group , let be IID with law on a measurable space; assume the subject families in distinct groups are independent. Let be measurable with , , and . If a measurable estimator of fixed has the separately established expansion, with remainder on the same sample probability space as its group sums,
then
The group count is fixed; the laws may differ. The covariance may be singular. This is a terminal finite-dimensional result: it neither proves the estimator expansion nor supplies a continuous-time or functional martingale CLT.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Assume AC, fixed finite and , deterministic sample sizes with and , independent subject families, centered square-integrable measurable with covariance , and the displayed estimator expansion with . Prove the displayed limit.
The Axiom of Choice: Assume the Axiom of Choice (AC).
Identical distribution and IID families: Within each group, IID means a common law and mutual independence of the whole family.
Independent families of event classes: For every finite selection of distinct independent indices and one event from each selected class, the probability of their intersection is the product of their probabilities.
Covariance matrix of a finite-dimensional random vector: For a finite-dimensional square-integrable vector with mean , and is positive semidefinite.
Multivariate iid central limit theorem: Under AC, IID centered vectors with finite second moment and covariance have normalized sums converging to , including singular .
Vector Slutsky theorem: If and , then every continuous function of converges in distribution to the same function of .
Continuous mapping theorem: A continuous map sends a weakly convergent random vector to the corresponding weak limit.
Characteristic function of a real random variable: The characteristic function is .
Levy continuity theorem forward direction: Weak convergence of real laws implies pointwise convergence of their characteristic functions.
Characteristic functions under affine maps and independent sums: For real , ; for a finite mutually independent family of real random variables, the characteristic function of its sum is the product of the individual characteristic functions.
Characteristic function of a normal law: A centered real normal law of variance has characteristic function , including .
Characteristic function criterion for weak convergence: Under AC, pointwise convergence of characteristic functions to that of a specified real probability law implies weak convergence to that law.
Multivariate normal law, including singular covariance: Under AC, exists for every positive semidefinite and each projection is normal with variance .
Cramer wold device: Under AC, convergence of every scalar projection to the projections of a specified finite-dimensional law implies vector weak convergence to that law.
Stochastic order and convergence notation for finite-dimensional random vectors: For vectors, means for every .
Proof
For each group, measurable preimages show that are IID; [F2] applied to preimages of finite event selections also shows independence across groups. Their means and covariances are and by assumption and [F3]. Since and , . Applying [F4] to each of the finitely many groups gives .
Put , so . Applying [F5] to the continuous map gives . For any fixed , [F6] gives convergence of the projections; by [F12], is normal, and the affine characteristic-function identity [F9] with [F10] identifies its scaled law as , including zero projected variance.
Let . By [F3], for every , so is positive semidefinite; under [A1], [F12] supplies . Set . Fix and any frequency . The scalar terms are independent across by [F2]. By the characteristic-function definition [F7], weak-convergence continuity [F8], independent-sum product identity [F9], and normal formula [F10], step 2.1 gives pointwise convergence of the characteristic function of to . This is the characteristic function of by [F12] and [F10]. The criterion [F11] gives .
Since step 3.1 holds for every and the specified target is , [F13] gives .
The expansion in the statement is . By [F14], is convergence in probability to the zero vector. Apply [F5] with the continuous addition map to step 4.1 to obtain the claimed estimator limit. This proof derives the group-sum limit but does not establish any consumer's expansion.
Depends on
- Identical distribution and IID families
- Independent families of event classes
- Covariance matrix of a finite-dimensional random vector
- Characteristic function of a real random variable
- Multivariate normal law, including singular covariance
- Stochastic order and convergence notation for finite-dimensional random vectors
- Multivariate iid central limit theorem
- Vector Slutsky theorem
- Continuous mapping theorem
- Levy continuity theorem forward direction
- Characteristic functions under affine maps and independent sums
- Characteristic function of a normal law
- Characteristic function criterion for weak convergence
- Cramer wold device
- The Axiom of Choice
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
78 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Sourav Chatterjee, Stats 310A (Math 230A) Lecture Notes, §§8.5.3, 8.8–8.9, PDF pp. 104–107 / printed pp. 100–103 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Rick Durrett, Probability: Theory and Examples, 5th ed., §3.10, Theorems 3.10.5–3.10.7, printed pp. 200–201 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Peter Bartlett, Theoretical Statistics, Stat 210B Lecture 16, PDF pp. 9–12 (standard reference, not scraped)