How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Independent splitting estimator moments and work
Statement
Run Independent fixed-level splitting on the nested levels of Nested rare-event levels and conditional laws with draws per level. Then In absolute error, For fixed , the right side is , uniformly in the rarity of ; the relative-variance formula has factors and gives no uniform relative-efficiency claim.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Nested events and conditional laws, independent exact conditional samples at every level, , and per-draw costs .
Independent fixed-level splitting: , with the level- mean of indicators sampled from ; the level arrays are independent and .
Unbiasedness and exact variance of the IID Monte Carlo mean: The mean of IID Bernoulli- indicators has expectation and variance .
Proof
Under , the indicator is Bernoulli with success probability . Thus [F4] gives and at each level.
The level arrays are independent by [F3], so by [F2], and . Subtracting gives the displayed variance and, after division by , the relative-variance formula. The work equality is the declared draws weighted by their level costs in [F3].
Put and . Then and . By step 2.1 and finite product expansion,
For fixed , expansion of the finite binomial gives . The relative formula in step 2.1 still contains , so this absolute bound does not give a rarity-uniform relative bound.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
13 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Adam M. Johansen, Pierre Del Moral, and Arnaud Doucet, Sequential Monte Carlo Samplers for Rare Events, §§2–3 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Gino Biondini, An Introduction to Rare Event Simulation and Importance Sampling, Handbook of Statistics 33, Chapter 2, §8 (standard reference, not scraped)