Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-09
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Infinite Ramsey theorem for fixed finite arity and colors

Statement

In ZFC, for positive finite integers n,r, every coloring c:[ω]nr has an infinite homogeneous subset. Thus ω(ω)rn.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Positive finite integers n,r; assume AC.

[F1]

Homogeneous means that all fixed-arity subsets have one color. Partition arrows and homogeneous sets

[F2]

A specified rule on a state set admits natural-number recursion. The recursion theorem

[F3]

Induction proves a property from its initial and successor cases. The principle of mathematical induction

[F4]

AC well-orders every set, in particular P(ω). The well-ordering theorem

[A1]

Proof

1.1

For arity one, the color fibers partition ω into r sets. If all were finite, their finite union would be finite, whereas ω is infinite. Hence one fiber is infinite and homogeneous by F1. More generally, the same conclusion holds for any finite coloring of an infinite subset of ω.

F1given
2.1

Assume the assertion at arity n1 and let c:[ω]n+1r. The induction assertion applies to every infinite subset Sω: enumerate it increasingly and pull back the coloring to [ω]n, then push forward an infinite homogeneous set. Fix a well-order of P(ω) by F4 and A1, so whenever the induction assertion supplies homogeneous infinite subsets we can take the first one in this well-order. This is the explicit choice use in the construction.

F4A1step 1.1given
3.1

Set S0=ω. Given infinite Si, set mi=minSi and consider on [Si{mi}]n the coloring uc({mi}u). Its argument has size n+1 because miu. By step 2.1 choose the first infinite homogeneous Si+1Si{mi}, and let ji<r be its color. The color is unique, since an infinite set has an n-element subset. Store Si and the stage as a state to apply F2. All subsequent mk for k>i belong to Si+1, and mi+1>mi because mi was its predecessor set's minimum.

F1F2step 2.1
4.1

By step 1.1 some color j<r has infinitely many indices K={i:ji=j}. Put H={mi:iK}. It is infinite since the mi increase strictly. Given any n+1 members, order their indices i0<<in. The last n nodes lie in Si0+1, so step 3.1 gives c({mi0,,min})=ji0=j. Thus H is homogeneous. This proves the successor assertion; with step 1.1, F3 proves the theorem for every positive finite arity.

F1F3step 1.1step 3.1

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

18 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources