Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedSession-authored (Fable 5 assisted)precheck passaudited 2026-08-26
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

For every n1 there are infinitely many primes p with p1(modn)

Statement

Facts & Assumptions

[L2]

Φn(0)=1 for every n2 (Φ1(0)=1 and Φn(0)=1 for n2).

[L7]

A nonzero polynomial of degree k over an integral domain has at most k distinct roots in it (A nonzero polynomial of degree n over an integral domain has at most n distinct roots).

Proof

technique · cases
1.1

In the case n=1, every integer is congruent to 1 modulo 1, since 1 divides every integer, so T1 is the set of all primes, which is not finite by [L8].

assume-case oneL8given
1.2

In the case n2, let STn be any finite set and put M:=npSp, an integer with M2; the goal is to produce a prime in Tn outside S.

assume-case biggiven
2.1

There is an integer k1 with Φn(kM)>1: the three polynomials Φn, Φn1 and Φn+1 are nonzero of degree φ(n)1 by [L1], so by [L7] over the integral domain Z at most 3φ(n) integers x satisfy Φn(x){1,0,1}; the integers M,2M,3M, are pairwise distinct, so some kM with k1 avoids that finite set.

step 1.2L1L7
2.2

Since Φn(0)=1 by [L2], there is hZ[t] with Φn=1+th; evaluating at kM gives N:=Φn(kM)=1+kMh(kM).

step 1.2L1L2given
3.1

By step 2.1 the integer N exceeds 1, so it has a prime divisor p by [L6], and pN. That prime does not divide kM: otherwise p would divide kMh(kM) and hence NkMh(kM)=1, which is impossible for a prime. In particular pM, so pn and pS, both n and every member of S dividing M.

step 2.1step 2.2L6given
4.1

Reduce modulo p. Since pΦn(kM), the class α:=[kM]p is a root of the image of Φn in (Z/p)[t], and α0 because pkM by step 3.1. Let E be a splitting field of tn1 over Z/p, which exists by [L4]; as char(Z/p)=p does not divide n, [L3] applies and α, lying in Z/pE, has order exactly n in E×.

step 3.1L3L4
5.1

The order of α in the subgroup (Z/p)× of E× is the same n, so n divides (Z/p)×=p1 by [L5]; that is p1(modn), so pTn and pS.

step 3.1step 4.1L5given
6.1

In the case n2, then, no finite subset of Tn exhausts it, so Tn is not finite; with step 1.1 the two cases are exhaustive and cover every n1.

step 1.1step 5.1cases-exhaustive

Remarks

  • What replaces the archimedean estimate. The usual proof chooses x large enough that Φn(x)>1 by a growth estimate. Step 2.1 replaces that by a root count, which needs no order structure on Z beyond the distinctness of the multiples of M, and gives exactly the same conclusion.

  • The case n=1 is not a degenerate instance. For n=1 one has Φ1(0)=1, not 1 (Φ1(0)=1 and Φn(0)=1 for n2), so step 2.2 is unavailable; the congruence is vacuous there and the statement is Euclid's theorem.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

105 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources