Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedverified 2026-10-22 (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Two-dimensional TV level-set convergence under a source condition

Statement

Assume Countable Choice. Let A:L2(Ω;R)→L2(Σ,μ;R) be bounded and real-linear, let f=Au†, and suppose u† is a minimum-TV exact solution with a dual source certificate p†, meaning A∗p†∈∂R(u†). Use R=TV2 on L2(R2) for full-space TV; for a nonempty bounded connected Lipschitz domain use either Dirichlet TV of the zero extension or Neumann TV relative to Ω. Let αn>0 tend to zero, let wn∈L2(Σ,μ;R) satisfy ∥A∗∥∥wn∥2/αn≤η, and suppose a global minimizer un is supplied for each functional u⟼12∥Au−(f+wn)∥22+αnR(u). For full-space or Dirichlet TV, assume η<2π; for bounded Dirichlet TV also assume Ω has global obstacle curvature κΩ∈L1(R2;R) with κΩ≥g almost everywhere outside Ω for some real-valued g∈L2(R2∖Ω;R). For Neumann TV, let CΩ be a constant satisfying ∥u−uΩ∥2≤CΩTV(u;Ω) on BV(Ω) and assume η<1/CΩ. In the Neumann case with A1Ω=0, choose the minimizers after subtracting their means.

There is a subsequence (unk) and a selected minimum-TV exact solution u0 such that Au0=f and, for almost every nonzero t, the canonical level sets of unk converge in measure to the canonical level set of u0, while their canonical ambient boundaries converge in Hausdorff distance. The limit u0 need not equal the initially named truth u† unless the minimum-TV exact solution is unique.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Countable Choice, the bounded linear forward map, a minimum-TV exact source-certified truth, the branch-specific parameter threshold, and supplied global regularized minimizers.

[A1]

Countable Choice supplies the subsequence selections in primal compactness and the level-integral diagonal argument. (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω))

[F1]

Primal compactness and selection of a minimum-TV limit: after a subsequence, un converges weakly in L2 and strongly in L1 on bounded domains or locally in L1 in full space to a selected minimum-TV exact solution u0; any certificate at u† remains a subgradient at u0.

[F2]

Canonical TV level sets and their boundaries: use {u>t} for t>0 and {u<t} for t<0, with their canonical density-one representatives and ambient topological boundaries.

[F3]

Tonelli and Fubini for the completed product, with only almost-everywhere section measurability: the layer-cake representation of ∣un−u0∣ may be integrated over space and levels.

[F4]

Bolzano-Weierstrass: every bounded real sequence has a convergent subsequence: every bounded scalar real sequence has a convergent subsequence. Applying it successively to the two coordinates gives the needed subsequence in R2, retaining the first coordinate convergence when selecting for the second.

[F5]

The density supplier now proves uniform ambient two-sided density and common support for all regularized and source-certified selected exact-limit level sets, including full-space radial support and both bounded-domain boundary conventions. Uniform density and Hausdorff convergence of TV level-set boundaries

Proof

1.1F5F1F2F3givenalgebra

Apply [F1] to the supplied minimizers, retaining its subsequence, and call its limit u0. Then Au0=f, R(u0) is minimal among exact solutions, and A∗p†∈∂R(u0). In bounded domains the subsequence already converges strongly in L1(Ω). In full space, [F5] supplies a common ball containing the regularized and limit level sets for almost every nonzero level. By [F2] and the positive and negative layer-cake identities, for each fixed n the integral of ∣un∣ outside that ball is the integral over levels of the measures of those level sets outside it; Tonelli [F3] makes this integral zero. The same argument applies to u0, so local L1 convergence from [F1] is global L1 convergence.

2.1F1F2F3step 1.1algebra

By [F2], for each real-valued u the positive and negative level sets use {u>t} for t>0 and {u<t} for t<0. They satisfy the pointwise layer-cake identity ∣u(x)−u0(x)∣=∫0∞∣1{u>t}−1{u0>t}∣ dt+∫−∞0∣1{u<t}−1{u0<t}∣ dt. Integrating and applying [F3] gives ∥un−u0∥1=∫0∞∣En+(t)△E0+(t)∣ dt+∫−∞0∣En−(t)△E0−(t)∣ dt. The right side tends to zero by step 1.1.

3.1A1F3step 2.1chooseconstruct

Let gn(t) denote the symmetric-difference measure of the positive level sets for t>0 and of the negative level sets for t<0. Step 2.1 says gn→0 in L1(R∖{0}). Choose a further subsequence with ∑k∥gnk∥1<∞; Tonelli implies ∑kgnk(t)<∞ for almost every nonzero t, hence the level sets converge in measure there.

4.1A1F5F1F2F4step 3.1chooseconstructcontradiction∎

Fix a nonzero level for which step 3.1 gives measure convergence. If the limit level set is empty and infinitely many regularized level sets are nonempty, [F5] gives compact common support, so each such set has a boundary point; choose one for each index using [A1]. Its two-sided density estimate at a fixed radius r<r0 forces symmetric-difference measure at least cπr2, contradicting convergence to the empty limit. If the limit set is nonempty, it has positive measure because it is a nonempty density-one representative; measure convergence therefore rules out infinitely many empty regularized sets. Hence empty status agrees eventually, and the empty boundaries have Hausdorff distance zero by [F2]. For the remaining nonempty sets, [F5] supplies the two-sided density and support bounds. If boundary points of Enk(t) stayed a fixed distance from ∂E0(t), choose them using [A1]; bounded support and [F4] give a convergent subsequence. A ball around its limit lies on one side of E0(t), while the two-sided density bound forces a fixed positive symmetric-difference measure, contradicting step 3.1. Conversely, if a boundary point of E0(t) stayed a fixed distance from every ∂Enk(t), choose these points using [A1]; compact support and [F4] give a subsequence converging to y∈∂E0(t). A connected ball around y misses those boundaries for all large k, so each Enk(t) is either full or empty there. A subsequence with one fixed status and measure convergence would make E0(t) full or empty almost everywhere on a smaller ball, contradicting that y lies on the boundary of its canonical density-one representative. Thus the canonical boundaries converge in Hausdorff distance. The limit is the selected solution from [F1]; if the exact minimum-TV solution is unique it equals u†, and otherwise no such identification is asserted.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

60 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources