How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Full-data uniqueness for the Euclidean Schrödinger Calderón problem
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice and Countable Choice. Let , let be a bounded, nonempty, connected smooth domain, and let . Suppose zero is not a Dirichlet eigenvalue of either , and the full Schrödinger Dirichlet-to-Neumann maps satisfy on all of . Then on .
Statement references
Facts & Assumptions
Given: AC and Countable Choice; a bounded smooth Euclidean domain in dimension ; real smooth nonresonant potentials ; and equality of their full boundary maps.
The Axiom of Choice is assumed by the finite-measure Fourier uniqueness supplier [F3].
The Axiom of Countable Choice () is assumed by the Euclidean CGO Fourier-basis construction [F2].
Alessandrini identities for scalar conductivity and Schrödinger DN maps and Scalar conductivity and Schrödinger Dirichlet-to-Neumann maps: the Alessandrini Statement gives the Schrödinger identity for smooth boundary values, while the DN definition gives weak boundary forms on . The exact solutions used below have only traces, so step 1.1 derives the needed extension directly from those forms.
Euclidean complex geometrical optics solvability with an H1 correction: for each large null , the equation has an exact solution with .
Uniqueness of finite Borel measures from their Fourier transforms: finite complex Borel measures on with the same Fourier transform are equal.
Proof
Given: the data in the Statement.
Set . For exact solutions let and define the Hermitian weak forms . By the weak DN definition, . Let be the solution with trace , which exists by nonresonant weak solvability. Then . Since and solves the weak equation, , where the conjugation uses real-valuedness of . Subtracting the two weak pairings gives . The maps agree on all of , so this integral vanishes. This establishes the weak-trace extension of [F1] used here.
Fix . Since , choose orthonormal perpendicular to ; when , choose any orthonormal pair. For , set and The orthogonality gives , , and . Apply [F2] directly to with phase and to with phase , which is also null. This gives Substitute in step 1.1. Since , Taking proves for every .
Define the finite complex Borel measure on . It has finite total variation because is bounded and is bounded. The identity in step 2.1 gives for every (take ). By [F3], . Hence for every Borel ; applying this to the sets , , and their imaginary-part analogues shows almost everywhere. Continuity of gives throughout .
Depends on
- Scalar conductivity and Schrödinger Dirichlet-to-Neumann maps
- Alessandrini identities for scalar conductivity and Schrödinger DN maps
- Euclidean complex geometrical optics solvability with an H1 correction
- Uniqueness of finite Borel measures from their Fourier transforms
- The Axiom of Choice
- The Axiom of Countable Choice ($\mathrm{AC}_\omega$)
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
37 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Mikko Salo, Calderon problem, full lecture notes (2008) (standard reference, not scraped)