How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Frozen Newton rates under differential range invariance
Statement
Assume the structural hypotheses of the frozen Newton one-step error lemma hold with fixed constants and notation. Let the initial pair be , where is the basepoint from the range-invariance factorization. At step , freeze the objective at the previous iterate , use parameters and , and let satisfy the resulting approximate-minimum inequality. Let and be the error and residual quantities from the one-step lemma for this step, with its input iterate relabeled and output iterate relabeled . Define . The parameter sequence and the associated are fixed independently of . Write
where are as in that lemma. Let decrease strictly to zero, suppose is finite and positive, decreases strictly to zero, and assume for some that
Assume each step through satisfies the one-step lemma, has tolerance , and the initial error is finite. Assume also that for every sufficiently small there is an index such that
for constants independent of . This bounded crossing condition is satisfied, for example, if is the last index with and for all .
Then the stopping iterate satisfies
and therefore
If has a strictly increasing inverse on the relevant range, then
which gives the corresponding source-index rate for the range-variable and nonlinear-range errors.
For the following three-dimensional EIT specialization, assume the Axiom of Choice, Countable Choice and Dependent Choice. Let , let the known conductivity be outside , impose fixed positive upper and lower conductivity bounds, use the exact intrinsic quadratic penalty with , and assume for . Use the centered mean-zero Neumann voltage map in and the explicit observation augmentation, admitted neighborhood , penalty , and linked-parameter constants in the EIT compatibility lemma. Choose the initial conductivity sufficiently close to the truth that its radius condition holds, and choose a fixed initial range variable in , independently of noise. Put
Take a fixed geometric parameter sequence, starting sufficiently far down its tail that the conjugate growth condition above holds, set , and use admitted approximate steps with . For a positive target , stop at the last index with . If the actual squared data noise is , then
in each of the following regimes: for the balanced choice and ordinary noise bounded by ; for every , giving under the same ordinary noise bound; and for the nominal endpoint , under the explicit stronger actual-noise condition . All tolerances remain bounded by through the stopping index. Thus the total conductivity and artificial-voltage norm error has logarithmic exponent in every stated regime.
Statement references
Frozen-step error and residual inequality
Christian Clason, Regularization of Inverse Problems, Theorem 10.7
The Axiom of Countable Choice ()
The full collared EIT class satisfies the centered range and source interfaces
Logarithmic source indices and their admissible parameter scales
Geometric parameters satisfy the logarithmic frozen stopping and growth conditions
Facts & Assumptions
Given: For the generic assertion, every satisfies the stated one-step and stopping hypotheses. For the EIT regimes, use their own stated actual-noise upper bound in those same hypotheses, with fixed structural constants and a fixed parameter sequence.
for and .
The tolerances satisfy .
and .
is independent of .
A frozen Newton step yields a controlled error inequality: and , where .
The EIT clauses use the Axiom of Choice, Countable Choice and Dependent Choice at their actual elliptic, trace, Fourier and Hilbert suppliers only.
The full collared EIT class satisfies the centered range and source interfaces verifies the full EIT frozen structural hypotheses with , , , the exact intrinsic Sobolev quadratic penalty, and source exponent .
Logarithmic source indices and their admissible parameter scales gives the logarithmic conjugate asymptotic.
Geometric parameters satisfy the logarithmic frozen stopping and growth conditions verifies the fixed geometric schedule, growth, bounded crossing and parameter-index asymptotics.
Proof
Since and is nonincreasing in its positive argument, [F1] and the definitions of and give . The first term in that contains the previous nonlinear-range error is at most , because contains and . Also, follows from [A1], and follows from [A2]. Therefore , where .
Use [F2] for the EIT clauses. Its exact convex regularizer agrees with the physical quadratic penalty on all admitted coefficients, and its local neighborhood verifies every Taylor, compatibility and projection requirement of [F1]. Since , [F4] supplies a fixed tail of any geometric sequence and a constant with . The initial pair is fixed and lies in the bounded admitted set, so is finite and independent of noise.
Iterating the recurrence from step 1.1 gives . For , repeated use of [A3] yields , so the sum is at most . Also , so , with constant independent of . The same estimate holds with replaced by any , so throughout the stopped segment. Thus .
The definition of , the inequality , and step 2.1 with show that . By [A3], ; by [A1]–[A2], and . Therefore , and the residual estimate in [F1] gives .
Since is a positive constant multiple of , its bound controls both displayed range errors. The definition in [F1] gives . Each nonnegative summand is at most , and is fixed, giving the two estimates. Finally, , so the data residual is . If is strictly increasing, gives ; monotonicity of then gives the stated index bound for .
In each displayed regime, and . By [F3]–[F4], the selected last-crossing index satisfies , , and . This gives exactly the three displayed parameter scales. For , the ordinary squared noise is because . The same bound is immediate in the balanced regime and is the explicit additional assumption at the endpoint. Hence a fixed positive multiple of is a valid noise upper bound; with this bound, [F4] supplies the original stopping bracket, and the tolerance condition is already the required one. Applying steps 1.1–3.1 at that upper-bound scale gives and .
The first component of is . Its norm is therefore bounded by the controlled range norm in , so gives the stated conductivity error after taking square roots. The projection norm is exactly , and the residual argument in step 4.1 uses the actual noise upper bound , giving both remaining estimates. Since every positive power of times a fixed power of its logarithm tends to zero, in all three regimes, proving the total norm-rate assertion.
Depends on
- Differential range invariance for Banach-space maps
- Joint and frozen-Newton objectives for range-invariant relaxations
- Banach-space convex subgradients and dual pairings
- Bregman distances for convex regularizers
- Variational source conditions on a regularizer sublevel
- A conjugate bound for residual and Bregman errors
- A frozen Newton step yields a controlled error inequality
- The Axiom of Choice
- The Axiom of Countable Choice ($\mathrm{AC}_\omega$)
- The axiom of dependent choice: a relation in which every element is related to something admits an $\mathbb{N}$-indexed chain
- The full collared EIT class satisfies the centered range and source interfaces
- Logarithmic source indices and their admissible parameter scales
- Geometric parameters satisfy the logarithmic frozen stopping and growth conditions
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
35 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Barbara Kaltenbacher, Convergence rates under a range invariance condition with application to electrical impedance tomography, Theorem 7, equations (2.31)–(2.41) (standard reference, not scraped)
- Frederic Weidling, Variational Source Conditions and Conditional Stability Estimates for Inverse Problems in PDEs, Theorem 2.20 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Christian Clason, Regularization of Inverse Problems, Theorem 10.7 (standard reference, not scraped)