Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)verified 2026-10-22 (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Hellinger stability of function-space posteriors under data perturbations

Statement

Let X,Y be separable real Banach spaces, let D⊆X be Borel, and let μ0 be a Borel probability measure on X with μ0(D)=1. Assume there is a bounded Borel subset E⊆D with μ0(E)>0. Give D the relative norm topology and trace Borel sigma-algebra B(D)={D∩A:A∈B(X)}. Let R>0 and let Φ:D×Y→R be jointly continuous and measurable from (D×Y,B(D)⊗B(Y)) to the Borel sigma-algebra of the extended real line after including its finite real values there. Suppose M1,M2:[0,∞)2→[0,∞) are Borel and nondecreasing in each argument, and for all u∈D and y,y′∈BY(0,R):={v∈Y:∥v∥Y≤R}, Φ(u;y)≥−M1(R,∥u∥X),∣Φ(u;y)−Φ(u;y′)∣≤M2(R,∥u∥X)∥y−y′∥Y. Assume JR:=∫DeM1(R,∥u∥X)(1+M2(R,∥u∥X)2) μ0(du)<∞. For each fixed datum y∈BY(0,R), define the evidence and posterior by Z(y):=∫De−Φ(u;y) μ0(du),Πy(du):=Z(y)−1e−Φ(u;y) μ0(du). Then there is zR>0 such that zR≤Z(y)≤JR for every y∈BY(0,R), and, with the library root-L2 Hellinger distance h, h(Πy,Πy′)≤CR∥y−y′∥Y,CR:=JR2zR+JR2zR, for all y,y′∈BY(0,R). This is a pointwise fixed-data statement; no observation law or conditional-law version is asserted. In a separate branch, if AC is assumed for the library density/total-variation comparison convention, then ∥Πy−Πy′∥TV≤h(Πy,Πy′)≤CR∥y−y′∥Y, where ∥P−Q∥TV:=sup⁡A∈B(D)∣P(A)−Q(A)∣.

Statement references

A prior is a Borel probability with full mass on its declared forward domain.

A Banach space is complete for its norm metric.

A separable space has an at most countable dense subset.

A norm induces the metric used on the parameter and data spaces.

The Borel sigma-algebra is generated by the open sets.

A probability measure has total mass one.

Continuity means inverse images of open sets are open.

Joint measurability is with respect to the product sigma-algebra.

A map is measurable when inverse images of measurable sets are measurable.

The extended real line adds two infinite endpoints to the real line.

The extended-real Borel sigma-algebra uses the order topology and restricts to the real Borel sets.

A product-measurable function has measurable fixed-coordinate sections.

Fixed-data evidence and the normalized potential update are defined fiberwise when evidence is positive and finite.

A common integrable lower envelope and continuity at support points imply positive finite evidence.

The support of a Borel probability on a separable Banach space is Borel and has full measure.

The library Hellinger distance is the root-L2 norm of the difference of square-root densities.

Under AC, library total variation is at most the library root-L2 Hellinger distance.

Arithmetic and absolute-value operations preserve measurability of real-valued functions.

The nonnegative integral is additive on sums of nonnegative measurable functions.

The root integral of a square defines the norm for square-integrable functions.

Minkowski’s inequality gives the triangle inequality for square-integrable functions.

Dashti and Stuart, full lecture notes, §4.1

Latz, full paper, §§3.1 and 3.4

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The separable Banach spaces, Borel full-measure prior domain, positive prior mass on a bounded subset, product-Borel measurability and joint continuity, common lower envelope, data-Lipschitz bound, and weighted integrability in the Statement.

[F1]

A prior on a forward domain is a Borel probability μ0 on X with μ0(D)=1. Product measurability as an extended-real-valued function makes each fixed-data potential section measurable; the evidence and posterior are Z(y)=∫De−Φ(u;y) dμ0 and dΠy/dμ0=e−Φ(u;y)/Z(y) when 0<Z(y)<∞. A Borel prior concentrated on a forward-map domain, Probability measures and probability spaces, The Borel sigma-algebra of a topological space, Misfit evidence and the potential posterior law, The product sigma-algebra and its finite iterates, A measurable function between measurable spaces, The extended real line R‾=R∪{−∞,+∞}, its order, and the arithmetic that is left undefined, The Borel sigma-algebra on the extended real line, Every section of a product-measurable function is measurable

[F2]

A continuous section on D is continuous in the relative topology; for a finite continuous potential with a common integrable lower envelope, the evidence is finite and strictly positive on every asserted data fiber. Continuity of a map of topological spaces at a point and globally, Function-space posterior propriety from a common lower envelope

[F3]

The support of a Borel probability on a separable Banach space is Borel and has full measure; here Banach means complete for the norm metric and separability supplies a countable dense set. The support of a Borel probability on a separable Banach space has full measure, Banach space, Separability: the existence of an at most countable dense subset, The Borel sigma-algebra of a topological space

[F4]

With the explicit posterior densities py=e−Φ(⋅;y)/Z(y) relative to μ0, h(Πy,Πy′)=∥py−py′∥L2(μ0). The displayed definition requires no further density choice when these representatives are supplied. Root-L2 Hellinger distance for dominated laws

[A1]

Assume the Axiom of Choice only for the optional generic density/TV comparison branch. The Axiom of Choice

[F5]

Under [A1], for two probability laws with a common sigma-finite dominator, ∥P−Q∥TV=sup⁡A∣P(A)−Q(A)∣≤h(P,Q) in the library conventions. Hellinger invariance and comparison with library total variation, Total variation distance for probability laws

[F6]

The derivative of t↦e−t/2 is −12e−t/2 and that of t↦e−t is −e−t; the real mean value theorem bounds an increment by the supremum of the derivative magnitude times the interval length. The exponential function is smooth and (exp⁡)′=exp⁡, The chain rule, in one line from Carathéodory: if g is differentiable at c and f is differentiable at g(c), then f∘g is differentiable at c with (f∘g)′(c)=f′(g(c)) g′(c), Mean value theorem on a closed real interval

[F7]

The nonnegative integral is monotone and positively homogeneous. Monotonicity and nonnegative homogeneity of the nonnegative integral

[F8]

For fixed R, the map s↦Mi(R,s) is Borel: the slice map s↦(R,s) is continuous in the usual product topology, and preimages under a continuous map preserve the sigma-algebra generated by open sets. The norm map and the real exponential are continuous, so composing these maps gives measurable radius integrands. A norm on a real vector space, the induced metric, and the dictionary with the metric axioms, The reverse triangle inequality ∣d(x,z)−d(y,z)∣≤d(x,y) in any metric space, The exponential function is strictly increasing, Composition with a Borel measurable outer map preserves measurability

[F9]

Sums, differences, and absolute values of measurable real-valued functions are measurable. Arithmetic and lattice operations preserve measurability whenever they are defined

[F10]

The nonnegative integral is additive, monotone, and positively homogeneous. Additivity of the nonnegative Lebesgue integral, Monotonicity and nonnegative homogeneity of the nonnegative integral

[F11]

For square-integrable real functions, the root integral of the square is the L2 norm and satisfies the triangle inequality. The function space Lp(μ) for 0<p<∞, Minkowski's inequality for integrals, including p=∞

[F12]

If a Borel set A has μ0(A)=1, then every Borel B satisfies μ0(B∩A)=μ0(B): the complement of A is null by countable additivity and μ0(B∖A)≤μ0(X∖A) by monotonicity. Probability measures and probability spaces, Measures on sigma-algebras, Measures are monotone

Proof

Given: The hypotheses and fixed-data convention in the Statement.

1.1F1F2F7F8F9givenalgebra

The fixed-radius sections s↦Mi(R,s) are Borel and nondecreasing by [F8] and the hypotheses. Since M2≥0, eM1(R,∥u∥X)≤eM1(R,∥u∥X)(1+M2(R,∥u∥X)2), so [F7] gives ∫DeM1(R,∥u∥X) dμ0≤JR<∞. Thus the hypotheses of [F2] hold for every y∈BY(0,R), and all stated pointwise updates are probability measures with 0<Z(y)<∞.

1.2F1F3F12givenchoose

By the Statement choose a bounded Borel set E⊆D with μ0(E)>0, and choose K<∞ with ∥u∥X≤K for all u∈E. By [F3], the support has full measure; applying [F12] to E gives μ0(E∩supp⁡μ0)=μ0(E)>0, so choose u∗∈E∩supp⁡μ0.

1.3F6F7F8F9F10F11givenalgebra

Fix u∈D and y,y′∈BY(0,R), and write a=Φ(u;y), b=Φ(u;y′), and δ=∥y−y′∥Y. Both a,b≥−M1(R,∥u∥X), so every real between them has the same lower bound. By [F6] and the data-Lipschitz hypothesis, ∣e−a/2−e−b/2∣≤12eM1(R,∥u∥X)/2∣a−b∣≤12eM1(R,∥u∥X)/2M2(R,∥u∥X)δ. Squaring and integrating, using [F7], gives ∥e−Φ(⋅;y)/2−e−Φ(⋅;y′)/2∥L2(μ0)≤12JR δ by the definition of the L2 norm [F11].

1.4F6F7F8F9F10givenalgebra

By [F6], the same lower envelope bounds the derivative of t↦e−t between a and b by eM1(R,∥u∥X). Hence ∣Z(y)−Z(y′)∣≤δ∫DeM1(R,∥u∥X)M2(R,∥u∥X) dμ0≤JRδ, where M2≤1+M22 and [F7] was used in the last inequality. For the first inequality, monotonicity and additivity apply to the pointwise bounds e−Φ(u;y)≤e−Φ(u;y′)+∣e−Φ(u;y)−e−Φ(u;y′)∣ and its reverse.

2.1F1F3F7F12givenstep 1.2chooseconstructalgebra

Continuity of u↦Φ(u;0) at u∗ gives ρ>0 such that Φ(u;0)≤Φ(u∗;0)+1 for u∈D∩BX(u∗,ρ). The support property gives μ0(BX(u∗,ρ))>0, and [F12] with μ0(D)=1 gives m∗:=μ0(D∩BX(u∗,ρ))=μ0(BX(u∗,ρ))>0. Every such u satisfies ∥u∥X<K+ρ. For any y∈BY(0,R), the data-Lipschitz bound between y and 0, followed by monotonicity of M2 in its norm argument, gives Φ(u;y)≤Φ(u∗;0)+1+M2(R,K+ρ)R. By monotonicity and positive homogeneity of the nonnegative integral [F7], this yields Z(y)≥m∗exp⁡[−Φ(u∗;0)−1−M2(R,K+ρ)R]=:zR>0, uniformly on the data ball.

3.1F7step 1.1step 2.1givenalgebra

The lower envelope gives e−Φ(u;y)≤eM1(R,∥u∥X), and [F7] therefore yields Z(y)≤∫DeM1(R,∥u∥X)dμ0≤JR. Together with step 2.1 this proves the asserted uniform normalizer bounds.

3.2F4F11step 2.1step 1.3step 1.4givenalgebra

Put ay=e−Φ(⋅;y)/2 and qy=ay/Z(y), so [F4] gives h(Πy,Πy′)=∥qy−qy′∥2. Add and subtract ay′/Z(y) and use the triangle inequality in L2 to obtain ∥qy−qy′∥2≤∥ay−ay′∥2Z(y)+∣Z(y′)−Z(y)∣Z(y). The first term is at most JRδ/(2zR) by steps 2.1 and 1.3. Since ∥ay′∥22=∫De−Φ(u;y′) dμ0=Z(y′), the second term equals ∣Z(y′)−Z(y)∣/[Z(y)(Z(y′)+Z(y))], hence is at most JRδ/(2zR) by steps 2.1 and 1.4. This proves the stated CR bound.

4.1A1F5step 3.2given∎

Under the separate assumption [A1], apply [F5] to the two explicit posterior densities relative to the common probability measure μ0. Thus ∥Πy−Πy′∥TV≤h(Πy,Πy′), and step 3.2 gives the optional TV estimate without adding an axiom to the Hellinger estimate.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

133 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources