Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)verified 2026-10-22 (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Hellinger error bound for posterior potential discretization

Statement

Let X be a separable real Banach space, let D⊆X be Borel, and let μ0 be a Borel probability measure on X with μ0(D)=1 and positive mass on some bounded Borel subset of D. Give D the relative norm topology and trace Borel sigma-algebra B(D)={D∩A:A∈B(X)}. Let Φ,ΦN:D→R be finite continuous potentials indexed by integers N≥1, let M1,M2:[0,∞)→[0,∞) be Borel and nondecreasing, and let ψN≥0 satisfy ψN→0. Suppose for every u∈D and every N, Φ(u)≥−M1(∥u∥X),ΦN(u)≥−M1(∥u∥X),∣ΦN(u)−Φ(u)∣≤M2(∥u∥X)ψN, and J:=∫DeM1(∥u∥X)(1+M2(∥u∥X)2) μ0(du)<∞. Define the pointwise fixed-data evidences and posterior updates by Z:=∫De−Φ(u) μ0(du),Π(du):=Z−1e−Φ(u)μ0(du),ZN:=∫De−ΦN(u) μ0(du),ΠN(du):=ZN−1e−ΦN(u)μ0(du). Then Z,ZN are positive and finite, and there are C<∞ and N0 such that h(Π,ΠN)≤CψN(N≥N0), where h is the library root-L2 Hellinger distance. This is a fixed-data assertion and makes no sampling-law or conditional-law version claim. In a separate branch, if AC is assumed for the library density/total-variation comparison convention, then ∥Π−ΠN∥TV≤h(Π,ΠN)≤CψN, where ∥P−Q∥TV:=sup⁡A∈B(D)∣P(A)−Q(A)∣.

Statement references

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A Borel prior concentrated on the forward domain, finite continuous potentials Φ,ΦN, a shared lower envelope, a pointwise error envelope M2ψN, and the weighted integrability condition in the Statement.

[F1]

Each finite continuous potential has a continuous section; under a common integrable lower envelope on a Borel full-measure forward domain in a separable Banach space, its fixed-data evidence is positive and finite and the normalized update is a probability measure. Continuity of a map of topological spaces at a point and globally, Banach space, Separability: the existence of an at most countable dense subset, The Borel sigma-algebra of a topological space, Probability measures and probability spaces, Function-space posterior propriety from a common lower envelope

[F2]

For a finite potential Φ, the fixed-data evidence is Z=∫De−Φ dμ0 and the posterior density relative to μ0 is e−Φ/Z when 0<Z<∞. A Borel prior concentrated on a forward-map domain, Misfit evidence and the potential posterior law

[F3]

For supplied densities p,pN relative to μ0, the library distance is h(Π,ΠN)=∥p−pN∥L2(μ0), with no factor 1/2. Root-L2 Hellinger distance for dominated laws

[A1]

Assume the Axiom of Choice only for the optional generic density/TV comparison branch. The Axiom of Choice

[F4]

Under [A1], for two probability laws with a common sigma-finite dominator, ∥P−Q∥TV=sup⁡A∣P(A)−Q(A)∣≤h(P,Q) in the library conventions. Hellinger invariance and comparison with library total variation, Total variation distance for probability laws

[F5]
[F6]

The nonnegative integral is monotone and positively homogeneous. Monotonicity and nonnegative homogeneity of the nonnegative integral

[F8]

Sums, differences, and absolute values of measurable real-valued functions are measurable. Arithmetic and lattice operations preserve measurability whenever they are defined

[F9]

The nonnegative integral is additive, monotone, and positively homogeneous. Additivity of the nonnegative Lebesgue integral, Monotonicity and nonnegative homogeneity of the nonnegative integral

[F10]

For square-integrable real functions, the root integral of the square is the L2 norm and satisfies the triangle inequality. The function space Lp(μ) for 0<p<∞, Minkowski's inequality for integrals, including p=∞

Proof

Given: The hypotheses and pointwise posterior convention in the Statement.

1.1F1F2F6F7F8givenalgebra

Since M2≥0, eM1(∥u∥X)≤eM1(∥u∥X)(1+M2(∥u∥X)2), so [F6] gives ∫DeM1(∥u∥X)dμ0≤J<∞. Apply [F1] to Φ and, separately for each fixed N, to ΦN; this gives 0<Z<∞ and 0<ZN<∞ for every N, and defines the displayed probability updates.

2.1F5F6F7F8F9step 1.1givenalgebra

Fix u∈D and N. Both potential values are at least −M1(∥u∥X), so every real between them has that lower bound. By [F5] and the potential-error assumption, ∣e−ΦN(u)−e−Φ(u)∣≤eM1(∥u∥X)M2(∥u∥X)ψN. Integrating and using M2≤1+M22 gives ∣ZN−Z∣≤JψN. The absolute difference of the integrals is bounded by the integral of the absolute difference: apply monotonicity and additivity to e−ΦN≤e−Φ+∣e−ΦN−e−Φ∣ and its reverse. Since Z>0 and ψN→0, there is N0 such that JψN≤Z/2 for every N≥N0, and then ZN≥Z/2.

2.2F5F6F7F8step 1.1givenalgebra

The same mean-value argument for t↦e−t/2 gives ∣e−ΦN(u)/2−e−Φ(u)/2∣≤12eM1(∥u∥X)/2M2(∥u∥X)ψN. Squaring and integrating yields ∥e−ΦN/2−e−Φ/2∥L2(μ0)≤12J ψN.

3.1F2F3F10step 2.1step 2.2givenalgebra

Put a=e−Φ/2 and aN=e−ΦN/2. The square roots of the posterior densities are q=a/Z and qN=aN/ZN by [F2]. Add and subtract aN/Z and use the triangle inequality in L2 to obtain ∥q−qN∥2≤∥a−aN∥2Z+∣ZN−Z∣Z. By [F3], the left side is h(Π,ΠN). Also ∥aN∥22=∫De−ΦN dμ0=ZN, which gives the displayed second term after applying [F10]. The first term is at most JψN/(2Z) by step 2.2. The second equals ∣ZN−Z∣/[Z(ZN+Z)], so by step 2.1 and ZN≥Z/2 it is at most JψN/Z. Therefore h(Π,ΠN)≤(J2Z+JZ)ψN, which is the claimed bound with a finite constant independent of N≥N0.

4.1A1F4step 3.1given∎

Under the separate assumption [A1], apply [F4] to the two explicit posterior densities relative to μ0. This gives ∥Π−ΠN∥TV≤h(Π,ΠN), and step 3.1 gives the optional TV consequence without adding an axiom to the Hellinger estimate.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

128 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources