How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Wave boundary data determine integrals along maximal geodesics shorter than T
Statement
Assume Countable Choice. Let be a compact, connected, nonempty simple Riemannian background of dimension , with smooth boundary, let , and let be static interior potentials. Suppose the full time-dependent forward Dirichlet-to-Neumann maps for and agree for every smooth Dirichlet input compactly supported in . Let be any unit-speed geodesic segment with , , directed inward at and outward at , and with length . Then
Statement references
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The two real static interior potentials on the stated simple manifold, equal full forward DN maps on all smooth time-compact inputs, and a maximal unit-speed ray of length .
Alessandrini identity for the time-dependent wave Dirichlet-to-Neumann maps gives the bilinear forward/terminal identity with outward classical traces.
Finite-order geometric optics along a maximal ray in simple geometry gives exact smooth forward and terminal waves with time-compact smooth boundary traces, uniformly bounded approximate norms, vanishing correction errors, and the unweighted ray-product limit.
Time-dependent Dirichlet-to-Neumann map for the wave equation specifies equality on the entire smooth time-compact boundary input space and the terminal map convention.
Proof
First use [F1] with both potentials equal to a single real . Its left side is zero, so for every in the boundary input space This is a bilinear transposition identity and uses exactly the classical forward and terminal solutions, whose endpoint terms vanish. Therefore the right side of [F1] for equals , which is zero under the assumed equality of forward maps. Hence for every admitted forward wave and terminal wave.
Choose and insert the exact waves of [F2] into step 1.1. Their boundary traces belong to the full input space for each , so the zero identity applies without a limit or density assumption on boundary data. The product convergence of [F2], with , gives The test is legitimate either by [F2]'s closed-cylinder conclusion or by a temporal cutoff equal to one on all approximate packets; its omitted exact-product terms contain vanishing correction factors. Since the ray was arbitrary subject to , every claimed ray integral is determined.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
19 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Mikko Salo, On geometric inverse problems and microlocal analysis (full author lecture notes, arXiv:2312.08123v1) (standard reference, not scraped)
- Medet Nursultanov and Lauri Oksanen, Introduction to inverse problems for hyperbolic PDEs (full lecture notes, arXiv:2311.06020v2) (standard reference, not scraped)