Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)verified 2026-10-22 (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Kirby moves classify integral framed-link presentations

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice. Let D0 and D1 be finite integral framed-link surgery diagrams in the standard oriented 3-sphere, with surgery results M0 and M1. Then M0 and M1 are orientation-preservingly diffeomorphic if and only if D0 and D1 are related by a finite sequence of ambient isotopies, framed handle slides, and additions or deletions of split ±1-framed unknots.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Full AC, finite integral framed diagrams D0,D1 in the standard oriented S3, and their oriented surgery results M0,M1.

[A1]

The Axiom of Choice is inherited by the suppliers below.

[F1]

Integral framed-link surgery diagram and Kirby moves on integral framed links specify the integer-framing, ambient-isotopy, fully framed band-slide and split signed-unit-unknot conventions.

[F2]

Kirby moves preserve the oriented surgery manifold proves that each allowed move, and hence each finite sequence, preserves the orientation-preserving diffeomorphism type of the surgery output.

[F3]

Marked relative surgery presentations and complete moves for three-dimensional ribbon bordisms proves marked relative surgery completeness. In the empty-decoration, closed-boundary case with fixed base N=S3, any prescribed orientation-preserving diffeomorphism of two surgery outputs is realized by a finite sequence of exterior framed isotopies, split signed-unit-unknot moves O1, framed slides O2, and moves O3 inserting or deleting a framed knot together with its small disk-zero-framed meridian. The proof supplies the signature-adjusted marked five-bordism, common middle trace, based descending handle movie and its full framed conversion; none of those constructions is inferred from a generic function path alone.

[F4]

Zero-meridian pairs are generated by Kirby moves in the three-sphere proves that every such O3 insertion or deletion, using the positively oriented small meridian, is a finite sequence of the moves in [F1], with the full component framings retained.

Proof

1.1givenA1F1F2construct

If D0,D1 are related by the stated finite sequence, apply [F2] to each move and compose its orientation-preserving diffeomorphisms. The result is an orientation-preserving diffeomorphism M0→M1.

1.2givenA1F1F3construct

Conversely, let f:M0→M1 be an orientation-preserving diffeomorphism. Use the two given diagrams as undecorated presentations based in the same standard oriented S3. Take empty external boundary, empty ribbon graph and arbitrary equal auxiliary weights; the global supplier's undecorated comparison is independent of its later decoration and evaluation clauses. Every component framing is its actual normal two-disk framing, as in [F1]. Thus [F3] applies to this specified f and yields a finite O1/O2/O3 and framed-isotopy sequence from D0 to D1. In particular it compares the given endpoint diagrams; it does not merely produce some new presentations of their output manifolds.

2.1F1F3F4step 1.2construct

The O1 and O2 operations in this sequence are precisely the split signed-unit-unknot moves and fully framed slides of [F1]. Replace each O3 insertion or deletion by the finite sequence supplied by [F4]. That lemma has no restriction on the companion knot's linking with the rest of the diagram, so it applies at every intermediate stage. Its integer normal framings agree with [F1]. This replacement need not preserve the particular marked map f, which the present claim does not require, but it preserves the exact endpoint framed diagrams. A finite list with finitely many finite replacements is finite.

3.1F1step 1.1step 2.1∎

The resulting sequence uses only ambient isotopy, fully framed handle slides and split ±1 unknot stabilization or destabilization. It joins D0 to D1, proving the converse. Together with step 1.1 this establishes the equivalence with all stated orientation, smoothness and finiteness conventions.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

31 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources