Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedverified 2026-10-22 (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Universality of the Kontsevich integral

Statement

Assume countable choice. Let VnC be the C-vector space of ambient-isotopy invariants of oriented knots with values in C and type at most n, where type at most n means that the alternating resolution sum on every (n+1)-singular knot is zero; set V−1C=0. Let Anun be the rational vector space on degree-n circle chord diagrams modulo 4T and 1T; a weight system is a Q-linear functional on this space. For an n-singular knot with chord diagram D, define σn([V])(D) to be the n-fold alternating resolution sum of V on that knot. Let I≤n(K)=∑j=0nIj(K) be the degree-n truncation of the normalized unframed Kontsevich series. The degree-n symbol map

σn:VnC/Vn−1C⟶Hom⁡Q(Anun,C)

is surjective. In particular, every rational weight system has a complex-valued finite-type lift; no rationality claim is made about that lift or about the coefficients of I(K). Moreover, for every n and every V∈VnC there is a complex-linear functional ΛV on ⨁j=0n(Ajun⊗QC) whose degree-n restriction is the degree-n symbol of V and such that

V(K)=ΛV(I≤n(K))

for every oriented knot type K. This recovery statement does not imply that distinct knot types have distinct Kontsevich series.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Countable choice, the unframed finite-difference convention, and the normalized Kontsevich series with coefficients in the complexified chord-diagram completion.

[A1]

The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω): countable choice is the only axiom needed here, through ambient-isotopy invariance of the normalized series.

[F1]

Singular knots and Vassiliev derivatives: an invariant is of type at most n when its (n+1)-fold alternating resolution sum vanishes on every (n+1)-singular knot.

[F2]

Framed chord diagrams and four-term relations: Ajun is the rational vector space on degree-j circle chord diagrams modulo 4T and 1T.

[F3]

Vassiliev invariants induce weight systems: for an unframed invariant of type at most n, the n-fold derivative is a well-defined rational-linear weight system on Anun; the conclusion holds for complex-valued invariants as well.

[F4]

Finite-type truncations of the Kontsevich integral: I≤n is type at most n, and on an n-singular knot with diagram D its n-fold derivative is D.

[F5]

The Kontsevich integral induces the identity on the associated graded: for each k-singular knot, DkI has no homogeneous terms below degree k and its degree-k term is the chord diagram of that knot.

[F6]

Braid and knot isotopy invariance of the normalized integral: under countable choice, each coefficient Ij(K) is a well-defined ambient-isotopy invariant of oriented knot types.

Proof

Given: As above. Extend each rational weight system complex-linearly to the complexified chord-diagram module.

1.1A1F2F4F5F6constructalgebra

Let W∈Hom⁡Q(Anun,C) be any weight system. Define VW(K)=W(In(K)), using the complex-linear extension of W. By [F6] this is an ambient-isotopy invariant. Since I≤n is of type at most n by [F4], each homogeneous coefficient, and hence VW, is of type at most n. For an n-singular knot with diagram D, [F5] gives DnVW(K)=W(D). Thus σn([VW])=W, proving surjectivity; in particular this holds for rational-valued weight systems.

2.1F1F3F4F5F6step 1.1constructalgebra∎

Let V∈VnC. Put R(n)=V. For k=n,n−1,…,0, define Wk=σk([R(k)]) using [F3], and set R(k−1)(K)=R(k)(K)−Wk(Ik(K)). The type bound in [F4] makes Wk∘Ik type at most k. For a k-singular knot with diagram D, [F5] gives Dk(Wk∘Ik)(K)=Wk(D)=DkR(k)(K). Therefore R(k−1) has zero k-fold derivative and is of type at most k−1. At k=0, the residual is type at most −1, hence is zero by the convention in [F1]. Consequently V(K)=∑k=0nWk(Ik(K)). Define ΛV on the degree-k summand by Wk and extend complex-linearly over the finite direct sum. This gives V(K)=ΛV(I≤n(K)) for every knot type. No step uses separation of knot types by I.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

30 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources