How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Lebesgue constants grow logarithmically
Statement
There are absolute constants such that, for every ,
Facts & Assumptions
Given: An integer .
For , and in particular for (Closed form and size bounds for the Dirichlet kernel).
Proof
For , [L1] gives , so Split the last integral at . On , [L1] and the bound give a contribution at most . On , one has , so [L2] implies . Using [L1], Therefore for a universal .
For , let These intervals lie in and are disjoint. If , then , so . Also . Hence [L1] gives
Integrating the lower bound from step 1.2 over each and summing yields Since one gets Using step 1.1 once more,
Steps 1.1 and 2.1 give the two-sided logarithmic bound.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
7 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Loukas Grafakos, Classical Fourier Analysis, 3rd ed. (standard reference, not scraped)
- Richard S. Laugesen, Harmonic Analysis Lecture Notes (standard reference, not scraped)