Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedSession-authored (Fable 5 assisted)precheck passaudited 2026-08-28 rests on unproved material (inherited)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Rests on 3 statements not proved in this library, by way of the results it cites. This item cites no such statement directly; it depends on results that do. The unproved premises it inherits are Cohen's first model: an infinite Dedekind-finite set of reals, Sierpiński 1947: the generalised continuum hypothesis implies the Axiom of Choice and The continuum hypothesis and its generalisation are independent of ZFC. Each is recorded with a citation to the literature and is not established here, because the track that would prove it has not yet been developed in this library. Everything else in this proof is proved here.

Length is additive along a subobject

Statement

Let BA be a subobject in an abelian category. If any two of the objects A, B, and A/B have finite length, then so does the third, and whenever all three do one has

(A)=(B)+(A/B).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A subobject BA.

[L1]

Finite length means admitting a composition series, and length is the common number of factors in such a series (Object of finite length).

[L2]

Jordan-Hölder makes the factor count independent of the chosen composition series (Jordan-Holder theorem in an abelian category).

[L3]

The second isomorphism theorem identifies the factors that arise from pulling a chain across a quotient or intersecting with a subobject (Second isomorphism theorem in an abelian category).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

Assume B and A/B have finite length. Choose composition series 0=B0<<Br=B,0=C0<<Cs=A/B. Let q:AA/B be the quotient map and put Dj:=q1(Cj). Then B=D0<D1<<Ds=A, and [L3] identifies each quotient Dj/Dj1 with Cj/Cj1. So 0=B0<<Br=D0<D1<<Ds=A is a composition series of A. Therefore A has finite length and (A)=r+s=(B)+(A/B).

L1L3chooseconstruct
1.2

Assume now that A has finite length, with composition series 0=A0<A1<<An=A. Intersecting with B gives an increasing chain 0=A0BA1BAnB=B, and quotienting by B gives an increasing chain in A/B. By [L3], each successive factor in either chain is a subquotient of a simple factor Ai/Ai1, hence is either 0 or simple. Deleting repeated adjacent terms therefore yields composition series of B and of A/B.

L1L3construct
2.1

Step 1.1 proves the extension direction and the displayed additive formula. Step 1.2 proves that finite length passes to subobjects and quotients. The number in the formula is independent of the chosen composition series by [L2].

L2step 1.1step 1.2

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

9 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources