How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Finite-dimensional module categories satisfy the intrinsic finiteness conditions
Statement
Let be a finite-dimensional unital algebra over a field , and let denote the category of finite-dimensional left -modules with -linear maps. Then is a finite -linear abelian category in the intrinsic sense of Finite k-linear abelian categories: it is a locally finite -linear abelian category (Locally finite k-linear abelian categories); every simple object has a projective cover, namely the cover supplied by Every finite-dimensional module has a projective cover, unique up to isomorphism over the target and identified with the general notion by Superfluous subobjects and projective covers in an abelian category; and there are finitely many isomorphism classes of simple objects. Moreover every simple left -module is isomorphic to a composition factor of the regular module , and every finite-dimensional module has length at most its -dimension. No choice is used.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A field and a finite-dimensional unital -algebra , with the category of all left -modules and the full subcategory of finite-dimensional left -modules.
For every ring the category of left -modules is abelian, with zero object, finite biproducts, kernels and cokernels given by the usual module constructions (Modules over a ring form an abelian category, Module homomorphism and isomorphism, kernel, image and cokernel).
Dimension facts over : a linear subspace of a finite-dimensional space is finite-dimensional and has dimension at most that of the ambient space, with equality exactly for ; the dimension of a finite direct sum is the sum of the dimensions; and rank-nullity gives for a subspace of a finite-dimensional space, in particular quotients of finite-dimensional spaces by subspaces are finite-dimensional (If and is a linear subspace of , then is finite-dimensional, , and if and only if , If with every finite-dimensional, then is finite-dimensional and ; in particular , Rank-nullity: ).
For left -modules the set is a -vector subspace of the space of -linear maps, with pointwise addition and scalar multiplication, and composition of -linear maps is -bilinear; moreover, if are finite-dimensional over , then (Module homomorphism and isomorphism, kernel, image and cokernel, k-linear categories and k-linear functors, and for finite-dimensional ).
An object has finite length exactly when it admits a composition series with simple factors; the length is the number of factors; and if any two of , , (for a submodule ) have finite length then so does the third, with (Composition series and composition factors of an object, Object of finite length, Length is additive along a subobject).
Every finite-dimensional left module over a finite-dimensional algebra has a projective cover in the module sense: there is an epimorphism with projective and finite-dimensional (Every finite-dimensional module has a projective cover, unique up to isomorphism over the target, Projective modules and the lifting property).
In a module category the general notion of a projective cover agrees with the module notion: joins of submodules are sums, so the general superfluity condition is the superfluous-kernel condition of the module definition (Superfluous subobjects and projective covers in an abelian category).
A module is simple when and its only submodules are and ; if is a submodule contained in the kernel of an -linear map , then the map factors uniquely through the quotient module (Simple module: a nonzero module with no proper nonzero submodule, Quotient module with scalar multiplication on additive cosets, A module homomorphism vanishing on factors uniquely through ).
A full subcategory of an abelian category containing the zero object and closed under finite biproducts, kernels and cokernels computed in the ambient category is an abelian subcategory there; the ambient abelian structure then makes it abelian, since kernels, cokernels and their images and coimages are those of the ambient category and the inverse of the image-coimage comparison again lies in the full subcategory (Abelian subcategory and exact embedding, Image and coimage in a category with kernels and cokernels, Abelian category, Subcategory and full subcategory).
Every nonempty set of natural numbers has a least element (The well-ordering principle).
Proof
The full subcategory of contains the zero module, and it is closed in under finite biproducts, kernels and cokernels: direct sums of finite-dimensional modules are finite-dimensional with dimensions adding, by [F2]; the kernel of an -linear map is a -subspace of the finite-dimensional , hence finite-dimensional; and the cokernel is a quotient of the finite-dimensional by a subspace, hence finite-dimensional with by [F2].
Every simple object of has a projective cover in the sense of Superfluous subobjects and projective covers in an abelian category: by the cover theorem [F5] there is a finite-dimensional projective module and an epimorphism whose kernel is superfluous in the module sense, and by [F6] this is exactly a superfluous subobject of in the general sense, so is an essential epimorphism with projective source, that is, a projective cover of .
Because is abelian by [F1] and is a full subcategory containing the zero object and closed under finite biproducts, kernels and cokernels computed there, step 1.1 makes an abelian subcategory of ; by [F8] it is therefore itself abelian.
For finite-dimensional modules the hom-set is a -subspace of by [F3], and is finite-dimensional with ; a subspace of a finite-dimensional space is finite-dimensional by [F2], and composition is -bilinear by [F3], so is a locally small -linear category with finite-dimensional hom-spaces.
Every object of has finite length and . Induct on . If then and the empty composition series witnesses finite length with . If , the set of dimensions of nonzero submodules of is a nonempty set of natural numbers, so by [L1] it has a least element , and some nonzero submodule has ; such an is simple, because for any nonzero the submodule is also a nonzero submodule of with and by [F2], so and by the equality case of [F2]. By [F2] the quotient has , so by the induction hypothesis has finite length with ; the simple module has finite length with , so the additivity theorem [F4] gives that has finite length and .
Every simple left -module is isomorphic to a composition factor of the regular module , and there are finitely many isomorphism classes of simple modules. The algebra is a finite-dimensional left -module, so by step 3.1 it has a composition series . Let be a simple left -module and ; the map , , is -linear with , so its image is a nonzero submodule of the simple module and is surjective. Let be least with , which exists because and the set is finite; then , and is a nonzero submodule of , hence equals , so the restriction of to is surjective with kernel containing and therefore factors through the quotient by [F7], giving a nonzero surjection ; the source is simple, so this surjection is an isomorphism, whence . Thus every simple module is isomorphic to one of the composition factors of , so there are at most isomorphism classes of simple modules.
Steps 2.1, 2.2 and 3.1 make a locally small -linear abelian category in which every object has finite length and every hom-space is finite-dimensional over , that is, a locally finite -linear abelian category; step 1.2 gives every simple object a projective cover, and step 4.1 shows that there are finitely many isomorphism classes of simple objects; hence is a finite -linear abelian category in the intrinsic sense of Finite k-linear abelian categories. The further claims are steps 4.1 and 3.1. All selections in the proof are made inside finite-dimensional objects (a nonzero submodule of least dimension and a composition series of the finite-dimensional algebra), so no choice principle is used.
Depends on
- If $V = \bigoplus_{i<n} U_i$ with every $U_i$ finite-dimensional, then $V$ is finite-dimensional and $\dim_F V = \sum_{i<n} \dim_F U_i$; in particular $\dim_F(U \oplus W) = \dim_F U + \dim_F W$
- $\dim_F M_{m\times n}(F)=mn$ and $\dim_F\mathcal L(V,W)=(\dim_FV)(\dim_FW)$ for finite-dimensional $V,W$
- Abelian category
- Abelian subcategory and exact embedding
- Composition series and composition factors of an object
- Finite-dimensional vector space, and its dimension $\dim_F V$; infinite-dimensional means having no finite basis
- Finite k-linear abelian categories
- Image and coimage in a category with kernels and cokernels
- k-linear categories and k-linear functors
- Locally finite k-linear abelian categories
- Module homomorphism and isomorphism, kernel, image and cokernel
- Object of finite length
- Projective modules and the lifting property
- Quotient module $M/N$ with scalar multiplication on additive cosets
- Simple module: a nonzero module with no proper nonzero submodule
- Subcategory and full subcategory
- Submodule of a module
- Superfluous subobjects and projective covers in an abelian category
- If $\dim_F V = n$ and $U$ is a linear subspace of $V$, then $U$ is finite-dimensional, $\dim_F U \le n$, and $\dim_F U = n$ if and only if $U = V$
- Length is additive along a subobject
- Modules over a ring form an abelian category
- Every finite-dimensional module has a projective cover, unique up to isomorphism over the target
- A module homomorphism vanishing on $N$ factors uniquely through $M/N$
- Rank-nullity: $\dim_F V=\operatorname{nullity}T+\operatorname{rank}T$
- The well-ordering principle
Used by
- Finite Eilenberg–Watts is a biequivalence Corollary
- Finite one-sided exactness is equivalent to the existence of the corresponding adjoint Corollary
- A finite right exact functor needs no infinite-coproduct hypothesis Example
- The dual-numbers tensor functor is right exact but not left exact Example
- The opposite Deligne product is the category of finite bimodules Lemma
- Finite abelian categories admit finite-dimensional module models Theorem
- Finite Deligne products exist via tensor-product algebras Theorem
- Finite Eilenberg–Watts for right exact linear functors Theorem
- Intrinsic finite category hypotheses give a finite projective generator Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
94 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Etingof, Gelaki, Nikshych, Ostrik, Tensor Categories, §1.8 (Definitions 1.8.1–1.8.6, Proposition 1.8.10, Corollary 1.8.11, Remark 1.8.7), printed pp.9–11 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Fuchs, Schaumann, Schweigert, Eilenberg–Watts calculus for finite categories and a bimodule Radford S^4 theorem, arXiv:1612.04561v3, §2.1 (Lemma 2.1, Lemma 2.2, Corollary 2.3, equation (2.1)) and §§3.1–3.2 (Definition 3.1, Theorem 3.2) (standard reference, not scraped)
- Peter Webb, A Course in Finite Group Representation Theory (23 Feb 2016 draft), Chapter 7 (projective covers of finite-dimensional modules) (standard reference, not scraped)