Alphabeta Math
DefinitionDefinition: Literature-sourcedProof: Not applicablePipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Superfluous subobjects and projective covers in an abelian category

Definition

Let C be an abelian category (Abelian category) and let n:N→P be a monomorphism, regarded as the subobject [n] of P (Subobject and quotient object as mutual-factorisation classes of monomorphisms and epimorphisms). The subobject [n] is superfluous when for every subobject [m]:M→P whose join with [n] satisfies

[n]∨[m]=[1P]

one already has [m]=[1P] (The join of two subobjects in an abelian category). Here [1P] is the subobject represented by the identity of P. An essential epimorphism π:Q→X is an epimorphism whose kernel, taken as a morphism ker⁡π→Q (Kernels and cokernels in a category with zero morphisms as equalizers and coequalizers, Monomorphism and epimorphism by left and right cancellation), represents a superfluous subobject of Q. A projective cover of X is an essential epimorphism π:Q→X with Q projective in the sense of Projective object.

As elsewhere on this page, the bracket notation abbreviates statements about representatives: [m]=[1P] says that m and 1P mutually factor (Subobject and quotient object as mutual-factorisation classes of monomorphisms and epimorphisms), and such a factorisation of 1P through the monomorphism m exhibits m as an isomorphism onto P. Thus in a module category the condition "[n]∨[m]=[1P] implies [m]=[1P]" reads "N+M=P implies M=P", where the join of subobjects of a module is the sum of the corresponding submodules, and this is precisely the superfluous-kernel condition of the module notion of An essential epimorphism is a surjection with superfluous kernel, and a projective cover is a projective source with such a map, with the same projective-source requirement. The class-and-size conventions used by the bracket notation are those of Class-sized category theory in ZFC: definable-class schemas, small and locally small categories, and why CAT is not formed.

This is the general form of the projective-cover clause of Finite k-linear abelian categories, whose phrasing "every simple object has a projective cover" is the module-scoped language of An essential epimorphism is a surjection with superfluous kernel, and a projective cover is a projective source with such a map read in an abstract abelian category. The definition asserts no existence of covers, selects no object, and uses no choice; each later existence statement is an explicit hypothesis.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

25 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources