How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Superfluous subobjects and projective covers in an abelian category
Definition
Let be an abelian category (Abelian category) and let be a monomorphism, regarded as the subobject of (Subobject and quotient object as mutual-factorisation classes of monomorphisms and epimorphisms). The subobject is superfluous when for every subobject whose join with satisfies
one already has (The join of two subobjects in an abelian category). Here is the subobject represented by the identity of . An essential epimorphism is an epimorphism whose kernel, taken as a morphism (Kernels and cokernels in a category with zero morphisms as equalizers and coequalizers, Monomorphism and epimorphism by left and right cancellation), represents a superfluous subobject of . A projective cover of is an essential epimorphism with projective in the sense of Projective object.
As elsewhere on this page, the bracket notation abbreviates statements about representatives: says that and mutually factor (Subobject and quotient object as mutual-factorisation classes of monomorphisms and epimorphisms), and such a factorisation of through the monomorphism exhibits as an isomorphism onto . Thus in a module category the condition " implies " reads " implies ", where the join of subobjects of a module is the sum of the corresponding submodules, and this is precisely the superfluous-kernel condition of the module notion of An essential epimorphism is a surjection with superfluous kernel, and a projective cover is a projective source with such a map, with the same projective-source requirement. The class-and-size conventions used by the bracket notation are those of Class-sized category theory in ZFC: definable-class schemas, small and locally small categories, and why is not formed.
This is the general form of the projective-cover clause of Finite k-linear abelian categories, whose phrasing "every simple object has a projective cover" is the module-scoped language of An essential epimorphism is a surjection with superfluous kernel, and a projective cover is a projective source with such a map read in an abstract abelian category. The definition asserts no existence of covers, selects no object, and uses no choice; each later existence statement is an explicit hypothesis.
Depends on
- Abelian category
- An essential epimorphism is a surjection with superfluous kernel, and a projective cover is a projective source with such a map
- Finite k-linear abelian categories
- Kernels and cokernels in a category with zero morphisms as equalizers and coequalizers
- Monomorphism and epimorphism by left and right cancellation
- Projective object
- Subobject and quotient object as mutual-factorisation classes of monomorphisms and epimorphisms
- The join of two subobjects in an abelian category
- Class-sized category theory in ZFC: definable-class schemas, small and locally small categories, and why $\mathbf{CAT}$ is not formed
Used by
- Finite length and finite Hom do not imply a finite category Counterexample
- Finite-support families of finite-dimensional vector spaces are locally finite but not finite Lemma
- Projective epimorphisms onto the simples generate every finite-length object Lemma
- Finite-dimensional module categories satisfy the intrinsic finiteness conditions Proposition
- Finite abelian categories admit finite-dimensional module models Theorem
- Intrinsic finite category hypotheses give a finite projective generator Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
25 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Etingof, Gelaki, Nikshych, Ostrik, Tensor Categories, §1.8 (Definitions 1.8.1–1.8.6, Proposition 1.8.10, Corollary 1.8.11, Remark 1.8.7), printed pp.9–11 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Peter Webb, A Course in Finite Group Representation Theory (23 Feb 2016 draft), Chapter 7 (projective covers of finite-dimensional modules) (standard reference, not scraped)