How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Projective epimorphisms onto the simples generate every finite-length object
Statement
Let be a locally finite -linear abelian category with finitely many isomorphism classes of simple objects, represented by , and suppose that for each a projective epimorphism is chosen (for instance the projective cover supplied by Superfluous subobjects and projective covers in an abelian category when is finite in the intrinsic sense). Then for every object of finite length there are integers and an epimorphism ; in particular, with , every object of admits an epimorphism for some . Only the finitely many chosen maps are selected, and no other choice is used.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A field , a locally finite -linear abelian category , simple representatives for all isomorphism classes of simple objects of , and chosen projective epimorphisms , .
An object has finite length exactly when it admits a composition series with simple factors ; the length is the number of factors, the truncation is a composition series of so that , and lengths are additive along a subobject (Object of finite length, Composition series and composition factors of an object, Length is additive along a subobject).
The quotient of an object by a subobject represented by is , written , and its defining map is the cokernel map (The quotient of an object by a subobject, Subobject and quotient object as mutual-factorisation classes of monomorphisms and epimorphisms).
A cokernel of satisfies , and every with factors as for a unique (Kernels and cokernels in a category with zero morphisms as equalizers and coequalizers).
A projective object has the lifting property: for every epimorphism and every there is with (Projective object).
Identities are epic, composites of epimorphisms are epic, and split epimorphisms are epic (Identities and composites of monomorphisms or epimorphisms retain cancellation; split monomorphisms are monic and split epimorphisms are epic).
A biproduct is simultaneously a product and a coproduct with injections and projections satisfying the biproduct identities, and biproducts are associative and commutative up to canonical isomorphism; in particular a morphism out of a biproduct is determined by its components, and an inclusion of a subfamily of summands is split by the corresponding projection (Biproduct, Biproducts are associative, commutative, and unital up to canonical isomorphism, An additive category is an Ab-enriched category with a zero object and finite biproducts).
is abelian, hence additive and preadditive: its hom-sets are abelian groups, composition is bilinear, and there is a zero object (Abelian category, Additive category, Preadditive category).
A simple object is nonzero and has exactly two subobjects, the zero subobject and its identity; by hypothesis every simple object of is isomorphic to one of (Simple object, given).
Proof
The assertion to be proved by induction on the natural number is: for every object of of length there are integers and an epimorphism . At a composition series of has no factors, so by [F1]; taking all , the empty biproduct is the zero object and the identity is an epimorphism by [F5], so the assertion holds at .
Assume the assertion at the natural number : for every object of with there are integers and an epimorphism .
Suppose has length and let be a composition series of ; then the last factor is simple by [F1], hence for some by [F8], and by [F1].
Successor step. Let have length , with composition series, last simple factor and of length as in step 1.3. By the induction hypothesis of step 1.2 applied to there are integers and an epimorphism , where is a finite biproduct of the chosen projectives. The quotient of [F2] is an epimorphism, and composing the chosen epimorphism with an isomorphism gives an epimorphism , so by the lifting property [F4] of the projective there is with . Let be the morphism with components the composite and , which exists and is unique by the biproduct property [F6].
The morphism of step 2.1 is an epimorphism. Let be a morphism with . Composing with the first biproduct injection gives , and is epic, so for the inclusion ; since is a cokernel of that inclusion by [F2], the universal property [F3] gives for some . Then composed with the second biproduct injection gives , and is epic, so and therefore . Since is preadditive [F7], a morphism with the property that every satisfying is zero is an epimorphism: from one gets , hence .
The source of the epimorphism of step 3.1 is a finite biproduct of the chosen objects : regrouping its summands by index, for integers by the associativity and commutativity of biproducts [F6]. Hence the successor case holds: of length admits an epimorphism .
Step 1.1 is the base case and steps 1.3, 2.1, 3.1 and 4.1 pass from to using the induction hypothesis of step 1.2, so by induction on every object of finite length admits an epimorphism for suitable integers . For the final clause put and ; by [F6] the power is the biproduct , whose subfamily of summands has as a biproduct, and the corresponding projection is a split epimorphism, hence epic by [F5]; composing it with an epimorphism onto gives an epimorphism by [F5]. The proof selects only finite data (a composition series of the object at hand, finitely many summand indices and biproduct structure maps, and the supplied epimorphisms ), so no choice principle is used.
Depends on
- An additive category is an Ab-enriched category with a zero object and finite biproducts
- Abelian category
- Additive category
- Biproduct
- Composition series and composition factors of an object
- Finite k-linear abelian categories
- Kernels and cokernels in a category with zero morphisms as equalizers and coequalizers
- Locally finite k-linear abelian categories
- Object of finite length
- Preadditive category
- Projective object
- Simple object
- Subobject and quotient object as mutual-factorisation classes of monomorphisms and epimorphisms
- Superfluous subobjects and projective covers in an abelian category
- The quotient of an object by a subobject
- Identities and composites of monomorphisms or epimorphisms retain cancellation; split monomorphisms are monic and split epimorphisms are epic
- Biproducts are associative, commutative, and unital up to canonical isomorphism
- Length is additive along a subobject
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
40 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Etingof, Gelaki, Nikshych, Ostrik, Tensor Categories, §1.8 (Definitions 1.8.1–1.8.6, Proposition 1.8.10, Corollary 1.8.11, Remark 1.8.7), printed pp.9–11 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Fuchs, Schaumann, Schweigert, Eilenberg–Watts calculus for finite categories and a bimodule Radford S^4 theorem, arXiv:1612.04561v3, §2.1 (Lemma 2.1, Lemma 2.2, Corollary 2.3, equation (2.1)) and §§3.1–3.2 (Definition 3.1, Theorem 3.2) (standard reference, not scraped)