How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The continuous dual separates points in a Hausdorff locally convex space
Statement
Assume HB. In a Hausdorff locally convex real or complex TVS, for every there is with . Equivalently,
Facts & Assumptions
Given: HB and a Hausdorff locally convex TVS .
The continuous dual is a vector space of continuous scalar-linear functionals (Local convexity, convex and balanced sets, and the continuous dual).
Every zero-neighborhood contains an open convex zero-neighborhood (Open and closed balanced convex zero-neighborhood refinements).
Under HB, a nonempty open convex set and a disjoint nonempty convex set have a continuous separator strict on the open side (Continuous separation when one convex set is open).
HB is the additional real dominated-extension principle (The real dominated-extension principle as an additional hypothesis over ZF).
Distinct points have disjoint open neighborhoods in a Hausdorff space (Hausdorff space: distinct points have disjoint open neighbourhoods; every metrizable space is Hausdorff and the indiscrete topology on two points is not).
Proof
Fix and put . Hausdorffness gives an open neighborhood of zero not containing , by taking disjoint open neighborhoods of zero and . Refine to an open convex zero-neighborhood . The singleton is convex and nonempty, and misses .
Apply open separation to and . There are and with . Consequently . The only non-ZF input is the HB application inside that separation theorem.
Every linear functional vanishes at zero, so zero belongs to the intersection of the kernels. For nonzero , step 2.1 applied to gives a functional with nonzero real part at , hence does not belong to that intersection. This proves the kernel identity from point separation.
Conversely, assume the kernel identity and fix , with . Some has . Over this already separates real parts. Over , if again use ; otherwise , and has . Thus the kernel identity implies the stated real-part separation. For there are no distinct points, and the kernel identity still holds. The proof selects a functional only for one fixed pair, never a simultaneous family.
Depends on
- Local convexity, convex and balanced sets, and the continuous dual
- Open and closed balanced convex zero-neighborhood refinements
- Continuous separation when one convex set is open
- The real dominated-extension principle as an additional hypothesis over ZF
- Hausdorff space: distinct points have disjoint open neighbourhoods; every metrizable space is Hausdorff and the indiscrete topology on two points is not
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
22 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Gerald Teschl, Topics in Real and Functional Analysis, section 5.1 (standard reference, not scraped)