How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Continuous separation when one convex set is open
Statement
Assume HB, the real dominated-extension principle over ZF. Let be nonempty disjoint convex subsets of a real or complex TVS , and suppose is open. There are a nonzero continuous -linear functional and such that If is also open, the same may be chosen with both pointwise inequalities strict. Here over . Neither Hausdorffness nor local convexity beyond the given open convex set is needed.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: HB and as in the statement.
Convexity and continuous duals have their TVS meanings (Local convexity, convex and balanced sets, and the continuous dual).
Translations, nonzero dilations and orbit maps are continuous, and a modulus-bounded linear functional on a zero-neighborhood is continuous (Translations, dilations and absorption in a topological vector space).
An open convex zero-neighborhood has a finite nonnegative sublinear gauge , with (Continuity, sublinearity and strict sublevels of an open convex gauge).
HB is an additional real extension principle over ZF (The real dominated-extension principle as an additional hypothesis over ZF).
Under HB a dominated real linear functional on a real subspace has a real linear extension with (Dominated extension conditional on the relative principle).
Restriction of scalars gives the underlying real vector space (A field is a vector space over itself, and over any subfield every -vector space is a -vector space by restricting the scalars, clause 2).
A nonempty bounded-below real set has an infimum (Every nonempty set bounded below has an infimum).
Proof
First work over the reals and let be nonempty open convex with . Fix and put and . Then is an open convex zero-neighborhood, , and because . The set is a real subspace: sums and real multiples remain on the line. If then multiplying by when would give , so the coefficient is unique. Thus is well-defined and real-linear.
For , ; for , . All hypotheses of the relative extension theorem are now met. Apply HB once to obtain real-linear extending with . In particular . This is the only non-ZF input in the proof.
On the open zero-neighborhood both gauges are less than one. Hence there, so is continuous by the modulus-bound criterion. For , . Therefore , and since .
For the given real , take and . This is open, since it is the union of the translates for ; it is convex by distributing each real convex combination through the difference. It is nonempty and excludes zero by disjointness. The preceding construction therefore produces a nonzero continuous real-linear with , or for every . It also produces a vector with .
The set is nonempty and bounded below by for any fixed . Let . By reversing the defining lower-bound inequalities, is the least upper bound of . Every is an upper bound, so . For , openness and continuity of give a positive with ; hence . If is open and , a small with would give , an impossibility. Thus both inequalities are strict when both sets are open.
For complex , restrict scalars to . The scalar inclusion is continuous since it preserves distance, so the restricted scalar action is jointly continuous. Convexity and openness are unchanged. Apply the real construction to obtain and . Set . It is additive and real-homogeneous, and . For , additivity and real homogeneity therefore give . Both and are continuous; scalar addition and multiplication are continuous, so is continuous. Its real part is , so it is nonzero and obeys the same inequalities. This proves the complex case as well, with the same single HB application and no assumption of AC.
Depends on
- Local convexity, convex and balanced sets, and the continuous dual
- Translations, dilations and absorption in a topological vector space
- Continuity, sublinearity and strict sublevels of an open convex gauge
- The real dominated-extension principle as an additional hypothesis over ZF
- Dominated extension conditional on the relative principle
- A field is a vector space over itself, and over any subfield $K \subseteq F$ every $F$-vector space is a $K$-vector space by restricting the scalars
- Every nonempty set bounded below has an infimum
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
27 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Gerald Teschl, Topics in Real and Functional Analysis (17 November 2017) (standard reference, not scraped)
- Theo Bühler and Dietmar Salamon, Functional Analysis (8 June 2017) (standard reference, not scraped)