Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Continuous separation when one convex set is open

Statement

Assume HB, the real dominated-extension principle over ZF. Let A,B be nonempty disjoint convex subsets of a real or complex TVS X, and suppose A is open. There are a nonzero continuous K-linear functional f and αR such that Ref(a)<αRef(b)(aA, bB). If B is also open, the same α may be chosen with both pointwise inequalities strict. Here Ref=f over R. Neither Hausdorffness nor local convexity beyond the given open convex set is needed.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: HB and X,A,B as in the statement.

[F1]

Convexity and continuous duals have their TVS meanings (Local convexity, convex and balanced sets, and the continuous dual).

[F2]

Translations, nonzero dilations and orbit maps are continuous, and a modulus-bounded linear functional on a zero-neighborhood is continuous (Translations, dilations and absorption in a topological vector space).

[F3]

An open convex zero-neighborhood has a finite nonnegative sublinear gauge p, with U={x:p(x)<1} (Continuity, sublinearity and strict sublevels of an open convex gauge).

[F4]

HB is an additional real extension principle over ZF (The real dominated-extension principle as an additional hypothesis over ZF).

[F5]

Under HB a dominated real linear functional on a real subspace has a real linear extension H with p(x)H(x)p(x) (Dominated extension conditional on the relative principle).

[F7]

A nonempty bounded-below real set has an infimum (Every nonempty set bounded below has an infimum).

Proof

1.1

First work over the reals and let D be nonempty open convex with zD. Fix d0D and put U=Dd0 and v=zd0. Then U is an open convex zero-neighborhood, v0, and pU(v)1 because vU. The set M={tv:tR} is a real subspace: sums and real multiples remain on the line. If tv=sv then multiplying (ts)v=0 by (ts)1 when ts would give v=0, so the coefficient is unique. Thus h(tv)=t is well-defined and real-linear.

F1F2F3
2.1

For t0, h(tv)=ttpU(v)=pU(tv); for t<0, h(tv)=t<0pU(tv). All hypotheses of the relative extension theorem are now met. Apply HB once to obtain real-linear H:XR extending h with pU(x)H(x)pU(x). In particular H(v)=1. This is the only non-ZF input in the proof.

F3F4F5step 1.1
3.1

On the open zero-neighborhood U(U) both gauges pU(x),pU(x) are less than one. Hence H(x)<1 there, so H is continuous by the modulus-bound criterion. For dD, H(d)H(d0)=H(dd0)pU(dd0)<1=H(z)H(d0). Therefore H(d)<H(z), and H0 since H(v)=1.

F2F3step 2.1
4.1

For the given real A,B, take D=AB and z=0. This is open, since it is the union of the translates Ab for bB; it is convex by distributing each real convex combination through the difference. It is nonempty and excludes zero by disjointness. The preceding construction therefore produces a nonzero continuous real-linear H with H(ab)<0, or H(a)<H(b) for every a,b. It also produces a vector v with H(v)=1.

F1F2step 1.1step 2.1step 3.1
5.1

The set H(A) is nonempty and bounded below by H(b0) for any fixed b0B. Let α=inf(H(A)). By reversing the defining lower-bound inequalities, α is the least upper bound of H(A). Every H(b) is an upper bound, so αH(b). For aA, openness and continuity of sa+sv give a positive s with a+svA; hence H(a)<H(a)+sα. If B is open and H(b)=α, a small s>0 with bsvB would give αH(bsv)=αs, an impossibility. Thus both inequalities are strict when both sets are open.

F2F7step 4.1
6.1

For complex X, restrict scalars to R. The scalar inclusion RC is continuous since it preserves distance, so the restricted scalar action is jointly continuous. Convexity and openness are unchanged. Apply the real construction to obtain H and α. Set f(x)=H(x)iH(ix). It is additive and real-homogeneous, and f(ix)=H(ix)iH(x)=H(ix)+iH(x)=if(x). For λ=a+ib, additivity and real homogeneity therefore give f(λx)=af(x)+bf(ix)=λf(x). Both H and xH(ix) are continuous; scalar addition and multiplication are continuous, so f is continuous. Its real part is H, so it is nonzero and obeys the same inequalities. This proves the complex case as well, with the same single HB application and no assumption of AC.

F1F2F6step 4.1step 5.1

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

27 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources