Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Lumer-Phillips generation theorem

Statement

Assume Dependent Choice (The axiom of dependent choice: a relation in which every element is related to something admits an N-indexed chain). Let A:D(A)⊆X→X be a densely defined dissipative operator on a Banach space X (Dissipative operator). Then the following are equivalent: (a) A generates a strongly continuous semigroup of contractions; (b) Ran(λ0I−A)=X for some λ0>0; (c) Ran(λI−A)=X for every λ>0. In that case A is closed, (0,∞)⊆ρ(A), ∥R(λ,A)∥≤1/λ for all λ>0, and A is maximal dissipative (it has no proper dissipative extension).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Dependent Choice; A densely defined dissipative operator A:D(A)⊆X→X on a Banach space X (Dissipative operator, Strongly continuous semigroup).

[F1]

Dissipativity means ∥(λI−A)x∥≥λ∥x∥ for all λ>0 and x∈D(A); hence each λI−A is injective and ∥(λI−A)−1z∥≤λ−1∥z∥ on the range of λI−A (Dissipative operator).

[F2]

Contraction Hille-Yosida: a closed densely defined operator with (0,∞)⊆ρ(A) and ∥R(λ,A)∥≤1/λ for all λ>0 generates a strongly continuous semigroup of contractions; conversely the generator of a contraction semigroup has (0,∞)⊆ρ(A) and ∥R(λ,A)∥≤1/λ (Contraction Hille-Yosida theorem).

[F3]

Resolvent identity: R(λ,A)−R(λ0,A)=(λ0−λ)R(λ,A)R(λ0,A) (Resolvent identity for closed operators). Consequently, for ∣λ0−λ∣<1/∥R(λ0,A)∥ the series ∑k≥0(λ0−λ)kR(λ0,A)k+1 converges in B(X) and its sum is the inverse of λI−A: writing R0=R(λ0,A) and Q=I+(λ−λ0)R0, one has (λI−A)R0=Q and, on D(A), λI−A=Q(λ0I−A). Thus R0Q−1 is a two-sided inverse and has range in D(A). In the Neumann series Q−1=∑k≥0(λ0−λ)kR0k, the operators commute with R0 by taking limits of polynomials, giving the displayed series. Indeed, for X≠{0}, B(X) is complete for the operator norm (If (Y) is Banach then (\mathcal B(X,Y)) is Banach) with submultiplicative composition (Composition satisfies |ST|\le|S|,|T|, The operator norm as the least bound and as the unit-sphere or unit-ball supremum), so the Neumann-series computation applies — for complex X through Neumann series and the unital Banach-algebra structure (Unital Banach algebra), and for real X by the identical telescoping computation. An operator with a bounded everywhere-defined inverse is closed: the inverse graph is the zero set of the continuous map (z,y)↦y−Rz, and swapping graph coordinates gives the graph of the original operator. A scalar shift of its graph is a homeomorphism. Hence A is closed as soon as λI−A has such an inverse; a closed bijective operator with bounded inverse lies in the resolvent set (Resolvent and spectrum of a closed operator on a Banach space).

[F4]

Operators of the form λI−A with λ>0 are closed when A is closed, and A is closed as soon as some λI−A has a bounded everywhere-defined inverse; generators are closed and densely defined (The generator is closed and densely defined, Resolvent and spectrum of a closed operator on a Banach space).

Proof

technique · direct: dissipativity gives injectivity and the inverse bound, surjectivity at one $\lambda_0$ propagates by the resolvent series, and the contraction generation theorem finishes
1.1F1F4

If X={0} then D(A)=X and all claims hold for the unique zero operator and semigroup; hence assume X≠{0}. (b)⇒ closedness, λ0∈ρ(A). Assume Ran⁡(λ0I−A)=X for some λ0>0. By [F1] λ0I−A is injective with ∥(λ0I−A)−1z∥≤λ0−1∥z∥ for all z∈X; thus its inverse is a bounded everywhere-defined operator and λ0I−A is bijective, so λ0∈ρ(A) and A is closed by [F4].

1.2F2

(a)⇒(b),(c). If A generates a contraction semigroup, [F2] gives (0,∞)⊆ρ(A) with ∥R(λ,A)∥≤1/λ; therefore every λI−A, λ>0, is bijective onto X, which is (c) and, taking e.g. λ=1, also (b). Trivially (c)⇒(b).

2.1F1F3step 1.1

Propagation to (0,∞). With λ0∈ρ(A) and ∥R(λ0,A)∥≤1/λ0, the series of [F3] converges for ∣λ−λ0∣<λ0 and represents R(λ,A); hence (0,2λ0)⊆ρ(A). Dissipativity now gives ∥R(λ,A)∥≤1/λ for every λ∈ρ(A)∩(0,∞) by [F1], in particular on (0,2λ0). Replacing λ0 by any λ1∈(λ0,2λ0), the same argument gives (0,2λ1)⊆ρ(A) with λ1>λ0; iterating with the explicit points λk=(3/2)kλ0, each inside the previous interval (0,2λk−1), gives (0,2λk)⊆ρ(A) for all k. Since λk→∞, this yields (0,∞)⊆ρ(A) and ∥R(λ,A)∥≤1/λ for all λ>0. In particular λI−A is surjective for every λ>0, so (c) holds.

3.1F2step 1.1step 2.1

(b)⇒(a). A is closed and densely defined by hypothesis and [step 1.1]; [step 2.1] supplies (0,∞)⊆ρ(A) and ∥R(λ,A)∥≤1/λ; hence [F2] makes A the generator of a strongly continuous semigroup of contractions.

3.2F1step 2.1

Maximal dissipativity. Let A′⊇A be a dissipative extension and fix λ>0. By [step 2.1], λI−A maps D(A) onto X; given x∈D(A′), choose y∈D(A) with (λI−A)y=(λI−A′)x. Since A′ agrees with A on D(A), (λI−A′)y=(λI−A)y=(λI−A′)x, and injectivity of λI−A′ by [F1] gives x=y∈D(A). Hence D(A′)=D(A) and A′=A: A has no proper dissipative extension.

4.1step 1.1step 2.1step 3.1step 1.2step 3.2∎

Combining the implications: (a), (b) and (c) are equivalent for a densely defined dissipative operator, and in that case A is closed, (0,∞)⊆ρ(A), ∥R(λ,A)∥≤1/λ, and A is maximal dissipative.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

47 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources