How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
An interior local maximum of the modulus forces a scalar holomorphic function to be constant
Statement
Let , let be a nonempty connected open set, and let be holomorphic. Suppose there are and an open ball centred at such that
Then is constant on .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A nonempty connected open set , a holomorphic function , a point , and an open ball centred at such that for every .
The composite of holomorphic maps is holomorphic and its complex Jacobian is the product (The composite of holomorphic maps is holomorphic and its complex Jacobian is the product).
If the modulus of a holomorphic function on a complex domain has an interior local maximum, then the function is constant (Local maximum modulus principle).
A holomorphic function vanishing on a nonempty open subset of a connected open set in vanishes identically (A holomorphic function vanishing on a nonempty open subset of a domain vanishes identically).
Balls in are the Euclidean balls of Balls, polydiscs and the distinguished boundary in .
Sums, products and nonvanishing quotients of holomorphic functions are holomorphic (Sums, products and nonvanishing quotients of holomorphic functions are holomorphic).
Proof
Because is an open ball centred at , there is such that in the Euclidean norm of [L4].
Fix a vector with , and define on the disc . The map is holomorphic, so [L1] makes holomorphic on ; and for every one has , hence . Therefore [L2] makes constant on all of .
Let be arbitrary. If there is nothing to prove. Otherwise put and ; then , , and , so step 2.1 gives . Thus is constant on the nonempty open set , and [L5] makes holomorphic on ; applying [L3] to and the open set yields on .
Remarks
- The argument gives constancy on the whole local ball. The slice theorem is applied on the entire disc cut out by the ball, not merely near the origin, so the proof first shows that is constant on all of and only then extends that constancy to by the several-variable identity theorem.
Depends on
- A holomorphic function vanishing on a nonempty open subset of a domain vanishes identically
- The composite of holomorphic maps is holomorphic and its complex Jacobian is the product
- Local maximum modulus principle
- Holomorphic functions on an open subset of $\mathbb{C}^m$
- Balls, polydiscs and the distinguished boundary in $\mathbb{C}^m$
- Sums, products and nonvanishing quotients of holomorphic functions are holomorphic
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
38 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- J. Lebl, Tasty Bits of Several Complex Variables, v4.4, Thm. 1.2.8 (standard reference, not scraped)
- M. Jabbari, Notes for Analysis and Geometry of Several Complex Variables, Thm. 22(8) (standard reference, not scraped)