Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedSession-authored (Fable 5 assisted)precheck passaudited 2026-08-26
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

An interior local maximum of the modulus forces a scalar holomorphic function to be constant

Statement

Let m1, let UCm be a nonempty connected open set, and let f:UC be holomorphic. Suppose there are aU and an open ball BU centred at a such that

f(z)f(a)(zB).

Then f is constant on U.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A nonempty connected open set UCm, a holomorphic function f:UC, a point aU, and an open ball BU centred at a such that f(z)f(a) for every zB.

[L1]

The composite of holomorphic maps is holomorphic and its complex Jacobian is the product (The composite of holomorphic maps is holomorphic and its complex Jacobian is the product).

[L2]

If the modulus of a holomorphic function on a complex domain has an interior local maximum, then the function is constant (Local maximum modulus principle).

[L3]

A holomorphic function vanishing on a nonempty open subset of a connected open set in Cm vanishes identically (A holomorphic function vanishing on a nonempty open subset of a domain vanishes identically).

[L4]

Balls in Cm are the Euclidean balls of Balls, polydiscs and the distinguished boundary in Cm.

[L5]

Sums, products and nonvanishing quotients of holomorphic functions are holomorphic (Sums, products and nonvanishing quotients of holomorphic functions are holomorphic).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

Because B is an open ball centred at a, there is r>0 such that {zCm:za<r}B in the Euclidean norm of [L4].

givenL4
2.1

Fix a vector vCm with v=1, and define gv(ξ):=f(a+ξv) on the disc D(0,r). The map ξa+ξv is holomorphic, so [L1] makes gv holomorphic on D(0,r); and for every ξD(0,r) one has a+ξvB, hence gv(ξ)=f(a+ξv)f(a)=gv(0). Therefore [L2] makes gv constant on all of D(0,r).

step 1.1L1L2
3.1

Let zB be arbitrary. If z=a there is nothing to prove. Otherwise put v:=(za)/za and ξ:=za; then v=1, ξ<r, and z=a+ξv, so step 2.1 gives f(z)=gv(ξ)=gv(0)=f(a). Thus f is constant on the nonempty open set B, and [L5] makes ff(a) holomorphic on U; applying [L3] to ff(a) and the open set B yields ff(a) on U.

step 2.1L3L5

Remarks

  • The argument gives constancy on the whole local ball. The slice theorem is applied on the entire disc cut out by the ball, not merely near the origin, so the proof first shows that f is constant on all of B and only then extends that constancy to U by the several-variable identity theorem.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

38 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources