How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Midpoint bit discretization has bounded coupling and CDF error
Statement
Assume Countable Choice and Dependent Choice as in Disjoint streams of independent fair bits produce independent uniform variables. Let be the uniform variable from an independent fair-bit stream. For , put Then is uniform on , pointwise, the 1-Wasserstein and Kolmogorov distances between their laws are at most , and their total-variation distance is exactly . We use over couplings, , and .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: An independent fair-bit stream, a bit budget , and the definitions in the Statement.
The bit-stream sum is uniform on , and every finite bit prefix is uniform. Disjoint streams of independent fair bits produce independent uniform variables
For probability laws, total variation here is the supremum of absolute event-probability differences. Total variation distance for probability laws
Every half-open or closed interval has Lebesgue measure equal to its length, including degenerate intervals. A box in with parameters is Lebesgue measurable of measure , whichever of its faces are included
The uniform law in [F1] is Lebesgue measure on ; its CDF and strict CDF are both the clipped identity by [F3]. Countable Choice is the assumption of [F3]. The Axiom of Countable Choice ()
The fair-bit product source in [F1] assumes Countable Choice and Dependent Choice. The Axiom of Countable Choice (), The axiom of dependent choice: a relation in which every element is related to something admits an -indexed chain
Proof
The first independent fair bits give each of the binary prefixes probability , so is uniform on the stated integer set. Write the remaining binary tail as . Then , while , hence .
The displayed coupling gives by the infimum definition of . For non-strict CDFs, ; for strict CDFs, . Since both uniform CDFs equal the clipped identity by [A1], these inclusions bound each absolute discrepancy by .
The law of is supported on its finite midpoint grid, which has probability under and probability under the continuous uniform law of . By [F2], this event gives , the maximal possible value.
Depends on
- Disjoint streams of independent fair bits produce independent uniform variables
- Total variation distance for probability laws
- A box in $\mathbb{R}^n$ with parameters $a_i\le b_i$ is Lebesgue measurable of measure $\prod_{i<n}(b_i-a_i)$, whichever of its faces are included
- The Axiom of Countable Choice ($\mathrm{AC}_\omega$)
- The axiom of dependent choice: a relation in which every element is related to something admits an $\mathbb{N}$-indexed chain
Used by
- Finite categorical sampling by inverse CDF and binary search Algorithm
- Finite-bit Box–Muller with certified elementary-function evaluators Algorithm
- A raw zero uniform breaks Box–Muller but the midpoint avoids it Example
- Certified bisection controls CDF residual, spatial error, and distribution error Theorem
- Certified finite-bit Box–Muller has explicit BL and W1 error Theorem
- Midpoint categorical frequencies have at most one-grid-cell error Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
42 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Luc Devroye, Non-Uniform Random Variate Generation, Chapter XV §1, The Random Bit Model (standard reference, not scraped)