Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck pass
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Box–Muller has a product Gaussian density and Rayleigh second moment

Statement

Assume Countable Choice. Let (U,V) have product Lebesgue probability law on (0,1)2, and set R=−2log⁡U,Θ=2πV,Z=(Rcos⁡Θ,Rsin⁡Θ). Then Z has the Borel density g(x,y)=12πe−(x2+y2)/2=ϕ(x)ϕ(y),ϕ(t)=e−t2/22π. In particular, its coordinates are independent with density ϕ. Also P(R>r)=e−r2/2 for r≥0 and ER2=2.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Countable Choice and the joint-uniform pair and transform in the Statement.

[F1]

For a C1 diffeomorphism between open Euclidean sets, nonnegative Borel change of variables is valid under Countable Choice. Borel change of variables from the compact-support formula and Radon uniqueness

[F2]

A coordinate hyperplane has two-dimensional Lebesgue measure zero under Countable Choice. A box with a degenerate side is Lebesgue null, and so is every coordinate hyperplane in Rn

[F3]

Tonelli's theorem factors nonnegative integrals on sigma-finite product spaces and allows order exchange. Tonelli's theorem for nonnegative measurable functions on a sigma-finite product

[F4]

Independence means independence of the generated sigma-algebras; factorization of probabilities on every finite Borel rectangle is an equivalent criterion. Independent random elements, Independent random elements are characterized by finite rectangle probabilities

[F5]

A probability measure has total mass one, and its pushforward law is again a probability measure. Probability measures and probability spaces

[F6]

Continuous maps pull Borel functions back to Borel functions. A continuous map has Borel preimages of Borel sets

[F9]

The map θ↦(cos⁡θ,sin⁡θ) bijects [0,2π) onto the unit circle, and its component derivatives are −sin⁡θ and cos⁡θ. A C1 map between open Euclidean sets with invertible derivative has a local C1 inverse with the inverse derivative. t↦(cos⁡t,sin⁡t) is a bijection from [0,2π) onto the real unit circle, The derivatives of sine and cosine are cosine and minus sine, The Euclidean inverse function theorem

[A1]

Countable Choice is the only choice assumption used by the change-of-variables and null-axis suppliers; no use is made of full Choice. The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)

Proof

Given: As in the Statement. Let D=R2∖{(x,0):x≥0}, an open slit plane. The map G(x,y)=(e−(x2+y2)/2,arg⁡(0,2π)(x+iy)2π) will be shown to be the inverse of the displayed Box–Muller map T from (0,1)2 onto D.

1.1givenF7F8F9algebra

By [F7]–[F8], r(u)=−2log⁡u is positive on (0,1), with inverse u=e−r2/2 for r>0. By [F9], the angles 2πv for 0<v<1 parametrize the unit circle with (1,0) removed exactly once. Thus T is bijective onto D, with inverse G. The scalar derivatives give r′(u)=−1/(ur(u)), so T is C1 and det⁡DT(u,v)=2πr(u)r′(u)=−2π/u≠0. The local inverse theorem [F9], together with global bijectivity, makes G a C1 inverse on D, with ∣det⁡DG(x,y)∣=e−(x2+y2)/2/(2π).

2.1givenF1F2F6A1step 1.1

For every nonnegative Borel h on D, [F6] makes h∘T Borel. Apply [F1] to G:D→(0,1)2 with integrand h∘T on its target. Since (U,V) has product Lebesgue law, this gives E[h(Z)]=∫Dh(x,y)g(x,y) dx dy. The omitted nonnegative x-axis is Borel and null by [F2], and Z always lies in D, so g is the density on all of R2.

3.1F3F4F5F8step 2.1algebra

By [F5], the pushforward law has total mass one, so its density integrates to 1. By [F3] and the exponential addition law [F8], writing A=∫Re−t2/2 dt∈(0,∞], we have 1=(2π)−1A2. Positivity of the integrand gives A>0, and the equality forces A<∞ and A=2π. Therefore g(x,y)=ϕ(x)ϕ(y) with each factor integrating to 1. For arbitrary Borel sets A,B⊆R, [F3] applied to 1A(x)1B(y)ϕ(x)ϕ(y) gives P(Z1∈A,Z2∈B)=(∫Aϕ)(∫Bϕ). Taking B=R or A=R identifies the marginal probabilities. Thus the Borel-rectangle factorization criterion [F4] proves independence, with the stated marginal densities.

4.1givenF3F7F8algebra∎

For r≥0, monotonicity and the inverse identities [F7]–[F8] give {R>r}={U<e−r2/2}; uniformity gives probability e−r2/2, also at r=0. Pointwise, R2=∫0∞2t1{t<R} dt. By [F3], ER2=∫0∞2te−t2/2 dt=2, using the substitution s=t2/2.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

125 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources