Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-13
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Every nonzero commutative ring has invariant basis number for finite bases

Statement

Every nonzero commutative unital ring has invariant basis number for finite bases: if Rm≅Rn as R-modules, then m=n. The proof is choice-free.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A nonzero commutative unital ring R and inverse module isomorphisms Rm⇄Rn.

[F1]

Invariant basis number means precisely that Rm≅Rn forces m=n for finite m,n (Invariant basis number and the rank of a free module).

[F2]

Rectangular matrix products use (AB)ik=∑jaijbjk; matrix multiplication is associative and the identity matrices are multiplicative identities, including for zero-sized shapes (Entrywise ring-matrix operations, rectangular matrix products, identity matrices and transpose, Matrix arithmetic over a commutative ring is associative, unital and distributive, and transpose reverses products).

[F4]

The module Rn is free on its standard coordinate vectors, and every vector has a unique finite coordinate expression (The free module on a set and its standard basis).

[L1]

An n×n matrix with a zero column or two equal columns has determinant zero (A square matrix with a zero column or two equal columns has determinant zero).

Proof

technique · contradiction
1.1

Record the images of the standard basis vectors from [F4] as the columns of rectangular matrices A and B. The coordinate formula and [F2] turn the two inverse composites into AB=In and BA=Im.

givenF2F4
2.1

Suppose first that n>m. Each of the n columns of AB is an R-linear combination of the m columns of A.

assume-contrastep 1.1F2
3.1

Expanding det⁡(AB) by multilinearity in all n columns, each term chooses one of the m columns of A in each of n positions. Since n>m, some chosen column repeats, so every term is zero by [L1]. Thus det⁡(AB)=0.

step 2.1F3L1
4.1

But AB=In, so normalization gives det⁡(AB)=1R≠0, contradicting step 3.1. Hence n≤m.

step 1.1step 3.1F3
5.1

Interchanging A,B and m,n gives m≤n. Therefore m=n, proving [F1]. The cases m=0 or n=0 are included: a strict inequality makes the other positive and the same determinant argument applies.

step 4.1F1discharge-contradiction∎

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

24 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources