How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Oddtown: distinct with every odd and every () even satisfy
Statement
Let be distinct subsets of . If every is odd and every intersection with is even, then .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: distinct subsets with every odd and every even for .
Over , the pairing is exactly when is odd and exactly when it is even ( is the image of in ; over it is or according to the parity of ).
If vectors in a bilinear space satisfy and for , then the vectors are linearly independent (Diagonal criterion: if and for , then are linearly independent).
A family with independent incidence vectors has at most members (If the incidence vectors of are linearly independent over then ).
Proof
Work over , which is a field by [F1]. Then [L1] turns the parity hypotheses into
This is exactly the diagonal criterion with , so the vectors are linearly independent over by [L2].
The master lemma [L3] now gives .
Remarks
- The argument uses the standard bilinear form on , not an inner product. Bilinearity and the diagonal pattern are enough.
Depends on
- $\langle v_A,v_B\rangle$ is the image of $\lvert A\cap B\rvert$ in $F$; over $\mathbb{F}_2$ it is $0$ or $1$ according to the parity of $\lvert A\cap B\rvert$
- Diagonal criterion: if $\langle v_i,w_i\rangle\ne0$ and $\langle v_i,w_j\rangle=0$ for $i\ne j$, then $v_1,\dots,v_m$ are linearly independent
- If the incidence vectors of $A_1,\dots,A_m\subseteq[n]$ are linearly independent over $F$ then $m\le n$
- The incidence vector $v_A\in F^{n}$ of a subset $A\subseteq[n]$ over a stated field
- The standard bilinear form $\langle x,y\rangle=\sum_{i<n}x_iy_i$ on $F^{n}$
- For every prime $p$, the two operations on $\mathbb{Z}/p$ make it a field
- The congruence class $[a]_n$ and the quotient set $\mathbb{Z}/n$
- A finite family of subsets of $[n]$ and its incidence matrix over $F$
Used by
- The n singletons form an Oddtown family, so the bound m≤ n is attained for every n Corollary
- An Oddtown family of four clubs on four citizens, and why a fifth cannot be added Example
- FALSE: an Oddtown family on [n] has at most n-1 members False statement
- Which field each bound is proved over, and what changes when it is replaced Remark
- Eventown: distinct A₁,…,Aₘ⊆[n] with every | Aᵢ| and every | Aᵢ∩ Aⱼ| even satisfy m≤ 2^⌊ n/2⌋ Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
30 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- L. Babai and P. Frankl, Linear Algebra Methods in Combinatorics, §1.1 (standard reference, not scraped)
- J. Matousek, Thirty-three Miniatures, Miniature 3 (standard reference, not scraped)
- O. Pikhurko, An Introduction to Combinatorics, §4.1 (standard reference, not scraped)