How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
A nonconstant scalar holomorphic function on a domain in is an open map
Statement
Let , let be a nonempty connected open set, and let be holomorphic and nonconstant. Then is an open map: for every open set , the image is open in .
This theorem is about scalar-valued holomorphic functions. It asserts nothing for holomorphic maps into with .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A nonempty connected open set , a nonconstant holomorphic function , and an open set .
A holomorphic function vanishing on a nonempty open subset of a connected open set in vanishes identically (A holomorphic function vanishing on a nonempty open subset of a domain vanishes identically).
The composite of holomorphic maps is holomorphic and its complex Jacobian is the product (The composite of holomorphic maps is holomorphic and its complex Jacobian is the product).
Every nonconstant holomorphic function on a one-variable complex domain is an open map (Open mapping theorem for holomorphic functions).
Balls in are the Euclidean balls of Balls, polydiscs and the distinguished boundary in , and convex subsets are those containing the segment between any two of their points (A convex subset of contains every line segment between two of its points).
An open map sends open sets to open sets (Homeomorphism, open map, closed map, embedding, and what it means for a property to be topological).
Proof
Let . Choose an open ball centred at . If were constant on , then would vanish on the nonempty open set , and [L1] would force to be constant on all of , contrary to the hypothesis. So there is with .
Define . Because is convex, is a nonempty open disc about containing . The affine map is holomorphic, so [L2] makes holomorphic on ; and , so is nonconstant.
By [L3], the image is open in and contains . Since , the point is interior to . As was arbitrary, every point of is interior, so is open by [L5]. Therefore is an open map.
Remarks
- Why the theorem is scalar-valued. The proof restricts to a complex line and then invokes the one-variable open mapping theorem. That argument produces an open image only in , not for maps into higher-dimensional targets.
Depends on
- A holomorphic function vanishing on a nonempty open subset of a domain vanishes identically
- The composite of holomorphic maps is holomorphic and its complex Jacobian is the product
- Open mapping theorem for holomorphic functions
- Holomorphic functions on an open subset of $\mathbb{C}^m$
- Balls, polydiscs and the distinguished boundary in $\mathbb{C}^m$
- A convex subset of $\mathbb{R}^m$ contains every line segment between two of its points
- Homeomorphism, open map, closed map, embedding, and what it means for a property to be topological
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
45 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- M. Jabbari, Notes for Analysis and Geometry of Several Complex Variables, Thm. 22(9) (standard reference, not scraped)
- J. Lebl, Tasty Bits of Several Complex Variables, v4.4, §1.2 (standard reference, not scraped)