How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
A strong limit of hydrostatic HLL updates solves the smooth-bed balance law weakly
Statement
Assume . Let and consider a sequence of full-line uniform hydrostatic HLL grids from Hydrostatic reconstruction with a dry-safe HLL flux and one-sided pressure corrections with widths and time steps . Set , , , and , and sample . On , let and be the piecewise-constant state and primitive-velocity reconstructions, with , on dry cells, and . Define and on that same slab, using the sampled bed. Assume that on every compact rectangle in , including the initial layer, the depths and velocities are uniformly bounded; that on every compact rectangle in , and strongly in and strongly in ; that almost everywhere where ; and that the initial reconstructions converge locally in to . Then satisfies, for every , Thus the limit is a locally bounded distributional weak solution of the shallow-water balance law in One-dimensional shallow-water balance law with a dry-state convention. Strong convergence, primitive-velocity convergence and the source-quadrature hypotheses are assumptions; this theorem proves no compactness, entropy inequality or convergence rate.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: , the discrete scheme on a vanishing uniform space-time grid, local uniform depth/velocity bounds, strong local convergence of depths, velocities and conserved states, the initial trace convergence, a stationary bed, and a compactly supported smooth vector test .
The only choice axiom is (The Axiom of Countable Choice ()).
Rewriting the corrected fluxes gives the exact recurrence (Hydrostatic reconstruction with a dry-safe HLL flux and one-sided pressure corrections).
Testing that recurrence by space-time cell averages gives the exact initial, time, face-flux and source identity (Exact space-time weak identity for the hydrostatic update).
Strong depth convergence and imply the discrete source reconstruction converges strongly in to (Hydrostatic pressure corrections converge to the smooth-bed source).
Under the stated strong state/velocity convergence, local bounds, bed regularity and , the reconstructed HLL face flux converges strongly in to (Hydrostatic HLL face fluxes converge under strong state and velocity convergence).
Strong local limits of nonnegative bulk and initial depths remain nonnegative; the relations , zero dry velocity and a locally uniform initial velocity bound put both limiting states in (A strong local L1 limit preserves shallow-water dry admissibility).
On compact spatial sets, the source quadrature estimate gives for bounded cell depths and (Hydrostatic pressure corrections converge to the smooth-bed source).
Proof
By [F5], applied to the nonnegative bulk and initial depths, the strong local convergences, , the dry-velocity convention and the local initial velocity bound, both and belong to almost everywhere. Thus in the weak formulation is defined.
Fix and choose so that vanishes for for all sufficiently large . Apply [F2] to the actual states, shared face fluxes and source terms of the scheme; its exact finite sum is zero for each such .
The initial term in [F2] tends to . Indeed, on each cell-time slab touching , the averaged test differs from by at most , and the uniform state bound including the initial layer makes the sum of these quadrature errors tend to zero on the fixed compact support. The initial reconstruction convergence then gives the claimed limit.
The time-difference sum in [F2] differs from by . Taylor's formula in time makes each difference of adjacent cell-time test averages equal to the integral of over the current slab, up to after spatial averaging; the uniform state bound and the cells/slabs meeting the support give total error . The omitted initial-slab integral is also .
The face-flux sum in [F2] differs from by . For each cell, the difference of adjacent test averages is the spatial average of ; replacing this average by has error at most per cell-time slab. The local depth and velocity bounds give , , and wave speeds at most . The physical fluxes and reconstructed states are bounded; in the middle HLL branch its equivalent convex-combination formula has coefficient , so the face fluxes are uniformly bounded as well. The number of cells/slabs meeting the support then gives the stated total error. The source sum in [F2] is exactly because is constant on each slab.
Choose a compact spatial interval containing the test support and all cells meeting it for sufficiently large , and choose beyond the temporal support. On this compact rectangle the hypotheses give uniform bounds for through ; the interior strong limits inherit the same essential bounds. Hence , , and the products with the fixed test derivatives are uniformly bounded. Step 1.5 supplies a uniform bound for . For sufficiently large , , and [F6] together with the local bounds on and the depths gives a uniform bound for ; the limit source is bounded too. Thus the contributions of all state, flux and source integrals from the initial layer are bounded by , uniformly in sufficiently large and for the limit integrands. On the remaining compact rectangle with , the assumed strong convergence gives convergence of the state integral, [F4] gives convergence of the face-flux integral, and [F3] gives convergence of the source integral. Taking for fixed and then proves convergence of these full integrals. Step 1.3 supplies the initial term, steps 1.4–1.5 identify the limits of the discrete sums, step 1.2 supplies the exact discrete identity, and step 1.1 its state admissibility. Passing to the limit proves the displayed weak formulation.
Depends on
- One-dimensional shallow-water balance law with a dry-state convention
- Hydrostatic reconstruction with a dry-safe HLL flux and one-sided pressure corrections
- The Axiom of Countable Choice ($\mathrm{AC}_\omega$)
- A strong local L1 limit preserves shallow-water dry admissibility
- Hydrostatic pressure corrections converge to the smooth-bed source
- Exact space-time weak identity for the hydrostatic update
- Hydrostatic HLL face fluxes converge under strong state and velocity convergence
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
17 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- H. De Sterck and P. Ullrich, Introduction to Computational PDEs, Chapter 3 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Benjamin Seibold, MIT OpenCourseWare 18.336, Lecture 19: Finite Volume Methods (standard reference, not scraped)
- E. Audusse, F. Bouchut, M.-O. Bristeau, R. Klein, and B. Perthame, A Fast and Stable Well-Balanced Scheme with Hydrostatic Reconstruction for Shallow Water Flows (standard reference, not scraped)