Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck pass
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Success bound under an explicit amplitude-amplification phase mismatch

Statement

Let 0<a<1, sin⁡2θ=a with 0<θ<π/2, 0<ϕ<π, and θ≤ϕ. Let ϑ∈(0,π/2] satisfy sin⁡ϑ=sin⁡(ϕ/2)sin⁡(2θ),m=⌈π2ϑ−12⌉. Let φ0∈[0,2π)∖{π} be the phase-matched value from Phase-matching condition for amplitude-amplification rotations. Use its signed representative φ:=φ0 when φ0<π and φ:=φ0−2π when φ0>π, so φ∈(−π,π). Let φ′∈(−π,π) be the implemented phase representative, with δ=∣φ′−φ∣. For either signed phase label α, a call to Amplitude amplification with independently chosen phase rotations uses the canonical input α if α≥0 and α+2π if α<0; its phase operation is unchanged. Put C:=32π2(3+π). If δ≤Cϵ ϕa for ϵ>0, then after m iterates using (ϕ,φ′), the failure probability is at most 4a+ϵ. The factor ϕa multiplies the displayed constant. In the equal-phase case φ′=ϕ, the failure probability is O(a/ϕ) over the same parameter range.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The exact phase iterates and parameter ranges in the Statement.

[F1]

Phase-matching condition for amplitude-amplification rotations: the canonical matched phase φ0∈[0,2π)∖{π} makes the two diagonal entries of the two-dimensional iterate equal and satisfies tan⁡(φ0/2)=(1−2a)tan⁡(ϕ/2).

[F2]

Prepared unitary and success subspace for amplitude amplification: ∣ψ⟩=a ∣G⟩+1−a ∣B⟩, with orthonormal good and bad vectors, and the bad projection is I−Πgood.

[F3]

Amplitude amplification with independently chosen phase rotations: S0(ϕ)=I+(eiϕ−1)∣0⟩⟨0∣ and Sgood(α)=I+(eiα−1)Πgood.

[F5]

exp⁡(x+iy)=ex(cos⁡y+isin⁡y), ∣exp⁡(x+iy)∣=ex, and eiπ+1=0 and Sine and cosine are 1-Lipschitz on R: ∣eix−eiy∣=2∣sin⁡((x−y)/2)∣≤∣x−y∣; also sin⁡t≤t for t≥0, by one-Lipschitzness and sin⁡0=0.

[F6]

Pythagoras, the parallelogram identity, and the real and complex polarisation identities: for an orthogonal projection, the projected and complementary components are orthogonal and their squared norms sum to the input squared norm.

[F7]

Projective measurement outcome weights are probabilities and A unit-vector outer product is a density operator: the squared norm of the good projection of the unit output vector is its good-outcome probability.

[F8]

The derivatives of sine and cosine are cosine and minus sine, Cosine has a smallest positive zero, lying strictly between zero and two, and Pi as twice the smallest positive zero of cosine: sin⁡0=0, sin⁡′=cos⁡, cos⁡′=−sin⁡, and π/2 is the first positive cosine zero.

[F12]

The principal inverse tangent arctan⁡:R→(−π/2,π/2) and Principal arctangent: derivative, integral, power series, and the Gregory–Leibniz series: the principal arctangent takes real values into (−π/2,π/2), is increasing, and has derivative 1/(1+x2).

[F13]

Cofunction, supplementary, quarter-turn, and reflection identities for the six trigonometric functions gives sin⁡(π/6)=cos⁡(π/3) and cos⁡(2π/3)=−cos⁡(π/3); Double-angle and quadratic power-reduction identities gives cos⁡(2x)=2cos⁡2x−1; Pi is the first positive zero of sine gives sin⁡x>0 for 0<x<π.

[F14]

Signs, monotonicity intervals, and ranges of sine and cosine: sine is strictly increasing and cosine strictly decreasing on [0,π/2].

[F15]

Quarter-turn values and shifts by pi/2 and pi: sin⁡(π/2)=1 and sin⁡(π/2+t)=cos⁡t, cos⁡(π/2+t)=−sin⁡t.

[F16]

A function differentiable at c is continuous at c: differentiability on an interval implies continuity at every point of that interval.

Proof

1.1givenF1F2F3F5F9F13F15algebra

By the addition and quarter-turn identities [F5], [F9], [F15], ei(α+2π)=eiα, so the canonical inputs specified in the Statement implement exactly the operators with the signed labels, and eiφ=eiφ0. In the ordered (∣G⟩,∣B⟩) basis, set u=eiϕ and v=eiφ. Since ∣u∣=∣v∣=1 by [F5], the phase operations act by unit-modulus scalars on orthogonal subspaces and are unitary. From A∣0⟩=∣ψ⟩ and the supplied phase operators, the iterate has matrix Q=−(v((1−a)+au)(u−1)a(1−a)v(u−1)a(1−a)a+(1−a)u). The diagonal entries coincide by [F1] and eiφ=eiφ0. The common diagonal is nonzero because the imaginary part of (1−a)+aeiϕ is asin⁡ϕ>0. The lower-left entry has modulus 2sin⁡(ϕ/2)a(1−a)=sin⁡(ϕ/2)sin⁡(2θ)=sin⁡ϑ. Thus the matched and implemented iterates are unitary and the matched matrix has equal diagonal entries.

2.1givenF1F2step 1.1algebra

Write the common diagonal as d and the lower-left entry as c. Unitarity gives ∣d∣2+∣c∣2=1, so ∣d∣=cos⁡ϑ because ∣c∣=sin⁡ϑ and ϑ∈(0,π/2]. Since d,c≠0, put η=d/∣d∣ and ζ=(c/∣c∣)η‾; both have modulus one, and d=ηcos⁡ϑ, c=ηζsin⁡ϑ. If b is the upper-right entry, column orthogonality d‾ b+c‾ d=0 gives b=−ηζ‾sin⁡ϑ. Hence Q=ηDR(ϑ)D−1, with D=diag⁡(1,ζ) and R(t)=(cos⁡t−sin⁡tsin⁡tcos⁡t).

3.1givenF2F7F9F13F14F15step 2.1algebra

Write mϑ=π/2+t. From m=⌈π/(2ϑ)−1/2⌉ we get ∣t∣≤ϑ/2. Quarter-turn, parity, and monotonicity identities give sin⁡(mϑ)=cos⁡t≥cos⁡(ϑ/2) and ∣cos⁡(mϑ)∣=∣sin⁡t∣≤sin⁡(ϑ/2). If a≥1/4, failure is at most 1≤4a. If a<1/4, put c=cos⁡(π/3)=sin⁡(π/6) by [F13]. Since 0<π/6<π, [F13] gives c>0, while the double-angle and supplementary identities give 2c2−1=cos⁡(2π/3)=−c. Thus (2c−1)(c+1)=0, and positivity yields c=1/2. Hence sin⁡θ=a<sin⁡(π/6), so θ<π/6 by [F14]. Because sin⁡ϑ=sin⁡(ϕ/2)sin⁡(2θ)≤sin⁡(2θ) and both angles lie in [0,π/2], [F14] gives ϑ≤2θ. The addition formulas [F9] and induction give R(ϑ)m=R(mϑ). The initial coordinates are (a,1−a), so the first coordinate of ηmDR(mϑ)D−1(a,1−a) has modulus [given, F2, F7, F9, F13, F14, F15, step 2.1, algebra] ∣acos⁡(mϑ)−ζ‾1−asin⁡(mϑ)∣≥1−a∣sin⁡(mϑ)∣−a∣cos⁡(mϑ)∣≥1−acos⁡(ϑ/2)−asin⁡(ϑ/2)≥(1−a)−a=1−2a. The last inequality uses ϑ/2≤θ, cosine decreasing and sine increasing on [0,π/2], and cos⁡θ=1−a, sin⁡θ=a. The scalar ηm has modulus one and D leaves the good coordinate unchanged. By [F7], the matched failure probability is therefore at most 1−(1−2a)2≤4a.

4.1givenF3F4F5F6F7step 3.1algebra

Let Q′ be the iterate with phase φ′. The arbitrary-phase definition gives [given, F3, F4, F5, F6, F7, step 3.1, algebra] Q′−Q=−AS0(ϕ)A†(eiφ′−eiφ)Πgood. For every unit vector x, the projection contraction in [F6] and unitarity give ∥(Q′−Q)x∥≤∣eiφ′−eiφ∣≤δ by [F5], hence ∥Q′−Q∥≤δ. Telescoping yields Q′m−Qm=∑r=0m−1Q′ m−1−r(Q′−Q)Qr, so unitarity gives ∥Q′m−Qm∥≤mδ. Set x=Qm∣ψ⟩ and y=Q′m∣ψ⟩ for ∣ψ⟩=A∣0⟩. Then ∥x−y∥≤∥Q′m−Qm∥≤mδ. By [F7], the failure probabilities are ∥Πbadx∥2 and ∥Πbady∥2. Contraction of Πbad and reverse triangle give ∣∥Πbadx∥2−∥Πbady∥2∣≤(∥Πbadx∥+∥Πbady∥)∥x−y∥≤2∥x−y∥≤2mδ. Thus implemented failure is at most 4a+2mδ by step 3.1.

5.1givenF5F8F10F11F14F15F16step 4.1algebra

For a<1/4, sin⁡(2θ)=2a(1−a)≥3a. Set x=ϕ/2∈(0,π/2) and g(x)=sin⁡x−2x/π. By [F8], [F15], g(0)=g(π/2)=0; by [F14], g′′(x)=−sin⁡x≤0. The derivatives in [F8], [F11] make g′ differentiable, hence continuous by [F16]; the mean value theorem [F10] applied to g′ gives g′(t)≤g′(s) for 0≤s<t≤π/2. The same facts make g continuous and differentiable, so [F10] on [0,x] and [x,π/2] gives slopes g(x)/x and −g(x)/(π/2−x); the first is at least the second, so g(x)≥0. Therefore sin⁡(ϕ/2)≥ϕ/π, sin⁡ϑ≥3ϕa/π, and ϑ≥sin⁡ϑ by [F5], [F8]. Also 1=sin⁡(π/2)≤π/2 by [F5], [F8], so 1/(2π)≤1. The ceiling gives [given, F5, F8, F10, F11, F14, F15, F16, step 4.1, algebra] m≤π2ϑ+12≤π223 ϕa+12≤π(π+3)23 ϕa, where the last inequality uses ϕa≤π. Under δ≤Cϵϕa with C=3/(2π2(3+π)), we obtain 2mδ≤ϵ/(2π)≤ϵ. Step 4.1 gives failure at most 4a+ϵ; when a≥1/4, the same bound is automatic since failure is at most 1≤4a.

6.1givenF1F8F10F11F12F16step 3.1step 5.1algebra∎

In the equal-phase case with a≤1/4, put T=tan⁡(ϕ/2)>0 and r=1−2a∈[1/2,1]. The matching condition [F1] and the principal inverse tangent [F12] give φ=φ0=2arctan⁡(rT) and δ=2(arctan⁡T−arctan⁡(rT)). Let f(s)=arctan⁡(sT). By [F11], [F12], f′′(s)=−2sT3/(1+s2T2)2≤0; differentiability and [F16] give the continuity needed to apply [F10] to f′, so f′ is nonincreasing. Applying [F10] to f on [0,r] and [r,1], the early secant slope is at least the late one; the secant slope on [0,1], their weighted average, is therefore at least the late slope. Thus f(1)−f(r)≤(1−r)(f(1)−f(0))≤(1−r)π/2, so δ≤π(1−r)=2πa. If δ>0, apply step 5.1 with ϵ=δ/(Cϕa); if δ=0, step 3.1 gives the matched bound. The resulting failure is at most 4a+(2π/C)a/ϕ≤(4π+2π/C)a/ϕ. For a≥1/4, 1≤2πa/ϕ, so the same big-O bound holds on the full range.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

95 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources