How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
A pure witness suffices for a QMA completeness threshold
Statement
For a finite QMA verifier with witness acceptance effect , if a witness density operator satisfies , then some pure-state density operator satisfies . Thus allowing mixed witnesses does not increase the completeness threshold.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A nonzero finite-dimensional witness space, a density operator , and its positive contraction from the verifier.
Density operator: a density operator is nonnegative, self-adjoint, and has trace one.
Complex spectral theorem: a normal endomorphism of a finite-dimensional complex inner product space has an orthonormal eigenbasis, and conversely: every finite-dimensional normal endomorphism has an orthonormal eigenbasis.
A finite verifier induces an effect on its witness: the acceptance probability of a witness density is and .
Dirac Notation Conversion: is the rank-one map for a unit vector .
Trace is a linear functional on : the finite-dimensional trace is linear.
The basis-independent trace of an endomorphism of a finite-dimensional vector space: trace is independent of the chosen ordered basis and is the sum of diagonal entries in that basis.
QMA promise class with a verifier effect on witnesses: on a YES instance the completeness threshold is witnessed by a density operator satisfying .
Proof
By [F1]–[F2], choose an orthonormal eigenbasis for , with eigenvalues . Basis independence [F6] and its diagonal-sum definition give . Thus , with zero eigenvalue terms allowed.
Linearity [F5] gives . By [F3], these terms are precisely the verifier's pure-state acceptance probabilities. By [F4], in an orthonormal basis beginning with , the rank-one factor has only its first diagonal entry nonzero after multiplication by ; [F6] therefore gives . This is a convex average; if every positive-weight term were below , its finite weighted average would be below . Hence some with has acceptance at least , so [F7] gives a pure witness meeting the QMA completeness threshold.
Depends on
- QMA promise class with a verifier effect on witnesses
- A finite verifier induces an effect on its witness
- Density operator
- Dirac Notation Conversion
- The basis-independent trace of an endomorphism of a finite-dimensional vector space
- Trace is a linear functional on $M_n(F)$
- Complex spectral theorem: a normal endomorphism of a finite-dimensional complex inner product space has an orthonormal eigenbasis, and conversely
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
34 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- John Watrous, Quantum Computational Complexity (standard reference, not scraped)
- Ronald de Wolf, Quantum Computing: Lecture Notes (standard reference, not scraped)