How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
2-Local Hamiltonian is QMA-complete
Statement
For fixed , the rationally encoded -Local Hamiltonian promise problem with polynomially many terms of polynomial norm and inverse-polynomial promise gap is QMA-complete. Hardness uses KKR's direct circuit-to-Hamiltonian reduction: penalize illegal unary clocks, incorrect one-qubit propagation, incorrect controlled-phase propagation, and nonzero initialized ancillas in that order. Every displayed summand is at most 2-local. If the four projection errors are each below , the amplified NO ground energy is at least , while YES energy is at most . The resulting gap is at least before rationalization; Rational encoding preserves a promised local-Hamiltonian gap yields a rational instance with inverse-polynomial encoding and preserved gap. Membership is The encoded Local Hamiltonian problem belongs to QMA.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A QMA promise verifier on input with polynomially bounded circuit size.
The encoded Local Hamiltonian problem belongs to QMA: rationally encoded fixed-locality Hamiltonian is in QMA using generated local measurements.
QMA completeness under promise-preserving reductions: QMA-completeness is membership plus hardness under deterministic promise-preserving reductions.
KKR restriction to legal unary clocks: a polynomial clock penalty restricts to legal unary clocks with error below .
KKR restriction to correct one-qubit propagation: a polynomial restricts legal histories to correct one-qubit propagation with error below .
KKR restriction to correct two-qubit propagation: a polynomial restricts to all correct propagation with error below .
KKR restriction to correctly initialized witness histories: a polynomial restricts to clean ancillas with error below and gives the output energy bounds.
Rational encoding preserves a promised local-Hamiltonian gap: rationalization shifts each energy threshold by at most the chosen total norm error.
Parallel QMA amplification remains sound for entangled witnesses: the verifier can be amplified with polynomial overhead to completeness at least and soundness at most .
Polynomial-time computations have logspace-uniform circuit families supplies polynomial-size Boolean circuits for a fixed polynomial-time predicate; the size, type, predecessor and output queries of A logspace-uniform Boolean circuit family enumerate their complete lists in polynomial time.
Effective synthesis of fixed-dimensional unitaries supplies an exact Toffoli decomposition over QC14 by its parity-phase construction. The exact one-qubit matrices of Exact one-qubit gates and rotations give , , and CNOT has the control-first action of CNOT and Control-Target Order.
Promise preserving reduction: a deterministic polynomial-time many-one map is promise-preserving when it sends YES inputs to YES inputs and NO inputs to NO inputs.
A pure witness suffices for a QMA completeness threshold: if a witness density operator attains a completeness threshold, some pure-state density operator attains at least the same threshold.
Proof
By [F8], amplify the verifier to completeness at least and soundness at most using polynomially many repetitions. On each YES input, [F11] lets the amplified verifier attain its completeness threshold with a pure witness. For each source input , make the amplified circuit input-specific: replace its classical input register and every parallel-copy input register by fresh zero-initialized scratch wires, count all of them among the clean ancillas , and prefix the circuit with on each root input bit where . Then use the CNOT fanout prescribed by [F8] to load the same basis string into each separate copy register. Use [F9] to enumerate Boolean circuits for the terminal predicates and the final majority predicate, specializing their classical input bits to . Implement these exactly: compute each Boolean node into a fresh zero bit in topological order, using and CNOT for constants and NOT, Toffoli for AND, and two CNOTs and a Toffoli for ; repeated input ports are handled by copying their common input. Copy the final accept bit to a fresh output and reverse the node computations. By [F12] every gate in this predicate computation is an exact QC14 word. Count all its zero-initialized work wires in . Thus no approximate quantum interpreter is invoked and there is no predicate-compilation acceptance error. Thus the input-penalized history starts with all input scratch registers zero, and the prefix and fanout set every verifier input to this particular before verification. Replace each CNOT by the exact identity ; , and has exact matrix . If there are no controlled- gates, add two cancelling gates on two fresh clean work qubits; their product is identity. For each designated on wires at time , insert at times before it and at after it. These commute with and each wire has two factors, so the computation is unchanged. Let count the resulting controlled- gates; choose polynomial larger than every one-qubit segment plus its four inserted steps, including the input-loading prefix, pad each segment with exact idle identity matrices on a fixed work wire to exactly one-qubit steps, placing all padding between its prescribed initial and final steps so that the two steps on each side of every stay adjacent to that gate, and set . Thus controlled- gates occur at , every other step is a one-qubit unitary, and all clock indices required by the KKR terms exist. The identities are matrix entries of the reduction's finite Hamiltonian list and do not alter the verifier computation. The padded length remains polynomial.
Set . First choose with effective gap , where bounds the compressed output term. Next choose so , with bounding . Then choose so , where bounds . Finally choose , where bounds all preceding weighted terms. The gaps are inverse polynomial by [F4]–[F5]; each is polynomial in the verifier length and earlier weights. Choose each next integer also larger than times the previous weight. All four remain polynomial and satisfy .
Apply the four restrictions in order. The illegal-clock term, one-qubit edge terms, KKR controlled-phase checks, and input penalty each lose less than from the least eigenvalue by [F3]–[F6]. On YES the valid clean history has energy equal to rejection probability, at most , so the full Hamiltonian has least eigenvalue at most by the projection-lemma upper bounds. On NO the final clean-history subspace has least output energy at least ; the four lower-bound errors sum to less than , so the full least eigenvalue is greater than .
All terms of are pair projectors. A one-qubit propagation check couples one work qubit and a clock projector. Each summand couples one work qubit and one clock bit, and each summand acts on one or two clock bits. Input and output terms couple one work and one clock qubit. Thus every summand is at most 2-local, and the number and norms are polynomial because there are polynomially many clock pairs and all four weights are polynomial. Choose rational thresholds , ; the strict bound in step 1.3 places every NO instance above . Apply [F7] with and shifted thresholds; this preserves at least gap and gives a polynomial-time rational encoding. The verifier generator and all arithmetic are deterministic polynomial time, so [F10] makes this a promise-preserving reduction from every QMA problem. Membership is [F1].
Depends on
- The encoded Local Hamiltonian problem belongs to QMA
- QMA completeness under promise-preserving reductions
- KKR restriction to legal unary clocks
- KKR restriction to correct one-qubit propagation
- KKR restriction to correct two-qubit propagation
- KKR restriction to correctly initialized witness histories
- Rational encoding preserves a promised local-Hamiltonian gap
- Promise preserving reduction
- Parallel QMA amplification remains sound for entangled witnesses
- A pure witness suffices for a QMA completeness threshold
- Polynomial-time computations have logspace-uniform circuit families
- A logspace-uniform Boolean circuit family
- Effective synthesis of fixed-dimensional unitaries
- Exact one-qubit gates and rotations
- CNOT and Control-Target Order
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
59 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Julia Kempe, Alexei Kitaev, and Oded Regev, The Complexity of the Local Hamiltonian Problem (standard reference, not scraped)
- Dorit Aharonov and Tomer Naveh, Quantum NP: A Survey (standard reference, not scraped)