Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-generatedPipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Fourier samples are uniform in the annihilator

Statement

For every finite abelian hidden-subgroup instance with hidden subgroup H≤G, one execution of the exact sample procedure returns a valid character code with probability one. Each χ∈H⊥ has probability 1/∣H⊥∣=∣H∣/∣G∣, every character outside H⊥ has probability zero, and every invalid b-bit code has probability zero.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The exact product QFT, projective measurement in its character-label basis, and discarded-output state from One finite abelian hidden-subgroup Fourier sample and Discarding the hiding register yields a coset-state mixture.

[F1]

Put N:=∣G∣, M:=∣H∣, and Q:=∣H⊥∣, and write NR:=ιR(N), MR:=ιR(M), and QR:=ιR(Q) for their positive canonical real images, viewed also in C. A normalized uniform coset state transforms to amplitude QR−1/2χ(g)‾ on H⊥ and zero outside. In the probability ratios in the Statement and below, 1/∣H⊥∣ means 1/QR and ∣H∣/∣G∣ means MR/NR. (Fourier transform of a subgroup coset indicator)

[F2]

Every value of an additive character of a finite abelian group has modulus one. (Values of additive characters of finite abelian groups have modulus one)

[F3]

The discarded-output input is the uniform mixture over distinct coset states. (Discarding the hiding register yields a coset-state mixture)

[F4]

∣H⊥∣=∣G∣/∣H∣. (Subgroup-annihilator cardinality)

[F5]

The abstract normalized Fourier coefficient matrix is unitary, with its column orthogonality supplied by the dual-index character sum. This is a matrix identity for the abstract group and character index spaces; it does not establish orthonormality of encoded register states. (Finite abelian Fourier transform is unitary, Dual-index character orthogonality)

[F6]

A density operator is a nonnegative endomorphism of trace one. (Density operator)

[F7]

The endomorphism trace is the sum of diagonal entries in an ordered basis. (The basis-independent trace of an endomorphism of a finite-dimensional vector space)

[F8]

The rank-one operator ∣x⟩⟨y∣ sends v to ⟨v,y⟩rootx by definition, and its coordinate matrix in ordered orthonormal bases is [x][y]†. (Dirac Notation Conversion, Dirac Notation Coordinate Identity)

[F9]

A projective-measurement outcome has weight tr⁡(ρPa). (Finite projective measurements)

[F10]

In a fixed ordered basis, the coordinate matrix of a finite sum of endomorphisms is the sum of their coordinate matrices; the definition of endomorphism trace and matrix-trace linearity therefore give trace linearity for the finite sums used here. (The basis-independent trace of an endomorphism of a finite-dimensional vector space, Trace is a linear functional on Mn(F))

[F11]

H⊥={χ∈G^:χ(h)=1 for every h∈H}. (Character annihilator of a subgroup)

[F12]

For N≥2, the sample procedure's supplied QG is a unitary on the full b-qubit register and its exact action on each valid group code is the prescribed Fourier superposition of valid character codes; the procedure measures the full b-bit computational basis. The N=1 branch instead returns the unique trivial character without a query. (One finite abelian hidden-subgroup Fourier sample)

[F13]

The problem definition makes the group code injective and uses the same least-residue, fixed-width encoding for character labels, which is injective coordinatewise. An n-qubit register is an ordered tensor product of Q2 factors (Finite registers and their ordered computational bases), with the declared bit order (Big-endian encoding of ordered bit strings). The factor bases are orthonormal (The computational basis is orthonormal), and the tensor inner product is the product of the factor inner products (Ordered tensor registers, their inner product, and wire permutations); hence the factor-basis theorem makes the lexicographic product computational basis orthonormal (The product basis is orthonormal and tensor dimensions multiply). Thus distinct valid group or character codes give orthonormal register states. (Finite abelian hidden-subgroup promise and output encoding)

Proof

If N=1, then G=H={0} and H⊥ contains the trivial character by [F11]. By [F4], ∣H⊥∣=∣G∣/∣H∣=1, so it is the singleton containing that character. The algorithm's trivial-group branch [F12] returns it with probability one. Here b=0, so the sole zero-bit code is valid by [F13] and there are no invalid codes. The claimed probability is 1=∣H∣/∣G∣. Assume N≥2 for the remaining steps.

1.1F3F6F7F8F12F13algebra

Fix a coset g+H in the mixture of [F3] and write its transformed vector as ψg=∑χ∈G^αg,χ∣χ⟩. The input coset ket is normalized by [F3], with its valid group-code coordinates orthonormal by [F13], and the supplied circuit QG is unitary by [F12], so ∥ψg∥=1. For any vector v, [F8] gives ⟨ρgv,v⟩root=∣⟨v,ψg⟩root∣2≥0 for ρg=∣ψg⟩⟨ψg∣. In character coordinates, ρg has diagonal entries ∣αg,χ∣2, whose sum is ∥ψg∥2=1; [F7] gives tr⁡(ρg)=1. Thus [F6] makes ρg a density operator.

1.2F1F2F7F8F9F11F12F13algebra

The valid character-code basis is orthonormal by [F13], independently of the abstract matrix unitarity in [F5]. The exact action in [F12] places ψg in its span, so every invalid b-bit outcome has probability zero. For a valid character χ, its rank-one projector Pχ=∣χ⟩⟨χ∣ has a single diagonal 1 at that code. The matrix of ρg has entries αg,μαg,ν‾, so the projective-measurement weight [F9], computed by [F7]–[F8], is tr⁡(ρgPχ)=∣αg,χ∣2. By [F1], [F2], and the support definition [F11], this is ∣QR−1/2χ(g)‾∣2=QR−1=1/QR when χ∈H⊥ and 0 otherwise; the square root is the positive real one.

2.1F3F10step 1.2

The probability in step 1.2 does not depend on the coset representative. The discarded-output state is the uniform mixture [F3], and trace linearity [F10] makes its measurement distribution the average of the same per-coset distribution. Hence the measured character is uniform on all of H⊥ and has zero probability outside it.

3.1F1F4step 2.1∎

By [F4], N=MQ, so the canonical real images in [F1] satisfy NR=MRQR: each image is the sum of the corresponding number of copies of 1, and distributivity preserves this product. Hence each supported outcome has probability QR−1=MR/NR, which is 1/∣H⊥∣=∣H∣/∣G∣ in the probability notation of [F1]. In the boundary case H=G, Q=1 and the coset-transform formula [F1] gives the single trivial character with probability one.

Remarks

The proof uses the normalized-state amplitude, not the unnormalized indicator coefficient ∣H∣/∣G∣. The current QA-05 annihilator-cardinality proof supplies the cardinality used here. The projective-measurement item and the required measurement and circuit page bodies were inspected for the sampling and terminal-readout hypotheses; those suppliers remain draft, and no independent acceptance is claimed.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

84 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources