How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
A nonzero L1 function and its transform cannot both have compact support
Statement
Assume countable choice, used through the uniqueness theorem. Let and let be compact sets such that almost everywhere on and on , where is the continuous transform (Fourier transform on complex L1 classes). Then almost everywhere. In particular, if is nonzero and with compact support, its transform cannot have compact support.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Countable choice (The Axiom of Countable Choice ()), a function , compact sets with almost everywhere on and on .
Countable choice is assumed; it is the hypothesis carried by the uniqueness theorem below (The Axiom of Countable Choice ()).
Compact support gives an entire continuation: converges absolutely at every , has entire coordinate slices, and satisfies for every real (Compact support gives an entire Fourier-Laplace transform by slices).
A separately holomorphic map on that vanishes on a nondegenerate real box is identically zero (Separately holomorphic functions vanishing on a real box are zero).
If have equal transforms, then almost everywhere (Uniqueness of the L1 Fourier transform).
A subset of is compact if and only if it is closed and bounded; in particular compact subsets are closed (Heine-Borel in : with the Euclidean metric a subset of is compact if and only if it is closed and bounded, and the proof by bisection uses no choice principle; the same holds on the real line). Consequently a nonempty open set contains a nondegenerate box: if and the ball of radius around lies in , then , since every point of this box is at Euclidean distance at most from .
Proof
The entire continuation of . By [F2] there is a function with entire coordinate slices and for every real ; hence is separately holomorphic and vanishes wherever does.
A box outside the compact frequency support. Since is bounded by [F5] and , choose such that and take . Since is closed, its complement is a nonempty open set; [F5] supplies a nondegenerate real box there. The argument also applies when is empty.
Vanishing of the continuation. On the box from step 1.2, by hypothesis and by step 1.1. Thus the separately holomorphic function vanishes on a nondegenerate real box. By [F3], on , so on .
Return to the original function. The functions and now have equal transforms, so [F1, F4] gives almost everywhere. Consequently a nonzero compactly supported function cannot also have compactly supported transform.
Depends on
- Uniqueness of the L1 Fourier transform
- The Axiom of Countable Choice ($\mathrm{AC}_\omega$)
- Fourier transform on complex L1 classes
- Compact support gives an entire Fourier-Laplace transform by slices
- Separately holomorphic functions vanishing on a real box are zero
- Heine-Borel in $\mathbb{R}^n$: with the Euclidean metric a subset of $\mathbb{R}^n$ is compact if and only if it is closed and bounded, and the proof by bisection uses no choice principle; the same holds on the real line
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
55 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Richard S. Laugesen, Harmonic Analysis Lecture Notes (arXiv:0903.3845) (standard reference, not scraped)
- Calder Sheagren, Uncertainty Principles with Fourier Analysis (University of Chicago REU 2017, author PDF) (standard reference, not scraped)