How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Fourier transform on complex L1 classes
Definition
Let and , with the componentwise integral and quotient conventions of Complex Lp classes and Euclidean test-function conventions, The space as the quotient by null functions and The class of integrable functions. Define Here , Lebesgue measure is used, and the exponential is The complex exponential by its power series. Its unit modulus follows from , , and . The integral is evaluated using any measurable representative. Absolute convergence and representative independence are the obligations discharged by The integral transform is representative independent ↗. The output is a function defined at every frequency, not merely an almost-everywhere class. At frequency zero the formula reads . No choice selection of representatives for a family of classes is part of this definition.
Depends on
Used by
- One-pass filtered reconstruction from finite Born data Algorithm
- Sharp frequency cutoffs have kernels that are not in L1 Counterexample
- Carleson operator and measurable linearisation Definition
- Fixed-frequency far-field data on the small-norm volume branch Definition
- A nonzero Schwartz function invisible to a limited-angle Radon transform Example
- A Poisson-type extension and its local and global Sobolev traces Example
- A smooth Bessel-blur truth with an explicit TV source certificate Example
- Finite limited-aperture Born samples miss a nonzero contrast Example
- Hilbert transform of the line Poisson kernel Example
- Poisson kernel transform and Abel summability on the line Example
- Sinc-square integral from Plancherel Example
- The Fourier transform of the heat kernel Example
- Transform of an interval indicator Example
- Compact support gives an entire Fourier-Laplace transform by slices Lemma
- Completeness of normalized probabilists’ Hermite polynomials in Gaussian L² Lemma
- Fourier coefficients of a lattice periodisation Lemma
- Fourier-slice identity for Schwartz inputs Lemma
- Gaussian decay gives an entire Fourier-Laplace transform and its growth bound Lemma
- Sampling at a lattice produces periodisation of the spectrum over the dual lattice Lemma
- The first Born data are the Fréchet linearization at zero contrast Lemma
- The integral transform is representative independent Lemma
- Well-definedness of the small-norm fixed-frequency scattering map Lemma
- A nonzero L1 function and its transform cannot both have compact support Theorem
- Hardy's Gaussian uncertainty principle in ℝⁿ Theorem
- Poisson summation for a full-rank lattice Theorem
- Poisson summation under two-sided polynomial decay Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
38 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Semyon Dyatlov, MIT 18.155 (2022) (standard reference, not scraped)