How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Fourier-slice identity for Schwartz inputs
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Countable Choice. For every , , and , the one-dimensional Fourier transform in the offset variable, using the phase , satisfies , where the two-dimensional transform uses the phase . On compactly supported smooth inputs the formula has the same line parameterization and normalization as the Euclidean Radon transform.
Statement references
Facts & Assumptions
Given: , , and .
The Radon transform maps Schwartz functions to Schwartz offset data: for fixed , the offset function is Schwartz and its line integral is absolutely convergent.
Fourier transform on complex L1 classes: for integrable .
A smooth bump between concentric Euclidean balls: for , there is a smooth cutoff equal to one on the radius- closed ball and supported in the radius- open ball.
Dominated convergence: pointwise convergence under a single integrable majorant permits passage to the limit under an integral.
Fubini's theorem for L^1 functions on a sigma-finite product: an absolutely integrable function on a product of sigma-finite measure spaces has integrable sections almost everywhere and its iterated integrals equal its product integral.
A C^1 diffeomorphism satisfies the change-of-variables formula for L^1 functions: assuming Countable Choice, a diffeomorphism changes an Lebesgue integral by the absolute Jacobian determinant.
Schwartz derivatives are integrable: under Countable Choice every Schwartz function and each of its derivatives is in .
The Axiom of Countable Choice (): Countable Choice is assumed for the compact-support Lebesgue/Riemann compatibility in [F1], the Lebesgue change-of-variables supplier [F7], and Schwartz integrability [F8].
Proof
The Schwartz seminorms and the estimate proved in The Radon transform maps Schwartz functions to Schwartz offset data give for every , after changing the constant. For this is integrable on in . The offset integral is absolutely convergent, and [F6] applied to the absolutely integrable function yields . The Lebesgue Fourier-transform definitions in [F3] are applicable by [F8].
Choose a smooth radial cutoff equal to one on the radius- ball and supported in the radius- ball, using [F4], and put . Then . The matrix with columns is a positively oriented orthogonal matrix, so its determinant is one. Apply the Lebesgue change-of-variables formula [F7] to the integrable compactly supported function and the map ; its pullback integral is .
As , and . The function is integrable by [F8], and the same Schwartz estimate in gives an integrable majorant for . Dominated convergence [F5] passes both integrals in step 1.2 to their limits; step 1.1 identifies the data-side limit with , while the spatial-side limit is . This proves the formula.
Depends on
- Radon transform on Schwartz functions
- The Radon transform maps Schwartz functions to Schwartz offset data
- Fourier transform on complex L1 classes
- Schwartz derivatives are integrable
- A smooth bump between concentric Euclidean balls
- Dominated convergence
- Fubini's theorem for L^1 functions on a sigma-finite product
- A C^1 diffeomorphism satisfies the change-of-variables formula for L^1 functions
- The Axiom of Countable Choice ($\mathrm{AC}_\omega$)
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
51 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Mikko Salo, On geometric inverse problems and microlocal analysis, §2.1 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Venkataswaran P. Krishnan and Eric Todd Quinto, Microlocal Analysis in Tomography (standard reference, not scraped)