How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Radon transform on Schwartz functions
Definition
For , , , and , define , where the absolutely convergent integral is with respect to one-dimensional Lebesgue measure. Here is the space of smooth complex functions for which every seminorm , for multi-indices , is finite. The parameter is the unit normal to the line, so and represent the same unoriented line. Under the Axiom of Countable Choice, the Lebesgue integral in this definition agrees on compactly supported smooth inputs with the compact-support Riemann line integral, so the normalization is the same.
Definition references
Compactly supported smooth domain, line normal, and normalization; current body inspected
Schwartz space and its seminorms
Countable Choice for the Lebesgue/Riemann integral agreement
Agreement of bounded Riemann and Lebesgue integrals under Countable Choice
Mikko Salo, On geometric inverse problems and microlocal analysis, §2.1
Venkataswaran P. Krishnan and Eric Todd Quinto, Microlocal Analysis in Tomography, §1.3.2
Depends on
Used by
- A nonzero Schwartz function invisible to a limited-angle Radon transform Example
- Fourier-slice identity for Schwartz inputs Lemma
- Restricted Radon data are square-integrable on fixed compact support Lemma
- The Radon transform maps Schwartz functions to Schwartz offset data Lemma
- Limited-angle data sample the visible Fourier wedge and zero frequency Proposition
- Limited-angle inversion has no Hölder modulus on a fixed-support H1 ball Proposition
Dependency tree · two levels
24 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Mikko Salo, On geometric inverse problems and microlocal analysis, §2.1 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Venkataswaran P. Krishnan and Eric Todd Quinto, Microlocal Analysis in Tomography (standard reference, not scraped)