Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)verified 2026-10-22 (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Restricted Radon data are square-integrable on fixed compact support

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Countable Choice. Let Ω⊂R2 be a nonempty bounded open set, let Θ⊂S1 be measurable, and use arc-length measure dθ on S1. For every f∈Cc∞(Ω;C), the function (θ,s)↦RSf(θ,s) belongs to L2(Θ×R,dθ ds) and satisfies ∥RSf∥L2(Θ×R)2≤diam⁡(Ω) ∣Θ∣ ∥f∥L2(R2)2.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The Axiom of Countable Choice, a nonempty bounded open set Ω⊂R2, a measurable Θ⊂S1, and f∈Cc∞(Ω;C).

[F1]

Radon transform on Schwartz functions: the data on the line with normal θ and offset s is ∫Rf(sθ+tθ⊥) dt.

[F2]

Cauchy-Schwarz inequality for L2: for square-integrable functions u,v, ∫∣uv∣≤∥u∥2∥v∥2.

[F3]

A C^1 diffeomorphism satisfies the change-of-variables formula for L^1 functions: under Countable Choice, a C1 diffeomorphism transforms an L1 Lebesgue integral by the absolute Jacobian determinant.

[F4]

Fubini's theorem for L^1 functions on a sigma-finite product: absolutely integrable functions on product spaces satisfy the iterated-integral formula.

[A1]

The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω): Countable Choice is used by [F3] for the Lebesgue change-of-variables formula; the remaining estimates are direct.

Proof

1.1F1givenconstruct

Choose R>0 with supp⁡f⊆B‾R(0). If ∣t∣>R, then ∣sθ+tθ⊥∣≥∣t∣>R and the integrand in [F1] is zero. On any compact set of (θ,s), uniform continuity of f on the compact image of (s,θ,t) for ∣t∣≤R shows that the line integrals vary continuously: the difference of two such integrals is at most 2R times the uniform difference of their integrands. Hence the data function is continuous and measurable.

1.2F1F2given

Put D=diam⁡(Ω) and Tθ,s={t∈R:sθ+tθ⊥∈Ω}. Any two points of Tθ,s differ by at most D, so this open set is contained in an interval of length at most D. Cauchy--Schwarz [F2] on Tθ,s, where the constant function 1 has squared integral at most D, gives ∣RSf(θ,s)∣2≤D∫R∣f(sθ+tθ⊥)∣2 dt.

2.1F3F4A1step 1.2∎

The function (θ,s,t)↦∣f(sθ+tθ⊥)∣2 is bounded and vanishes unless ∣s∣,∣t∣≤R, so it is integrable on the finite-measure set Θ×[−R,R]2. Apply [F4] to exchange the iterated integrals, and for each θ apply [F3] to the orthogonal diffeomorphism (s,t)↦sθ+tθ⊥, whose absolute Jacobian is one. This gives ∫Θ∫R2∣f(sθ+tθ⊥)∣2 ds dt dθ=∣Θ∣ ∥f∥L2(R2)2. Integrating step 1.2 yields the claimed bound and square-integrability.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

33 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources